Citizen Participation in Transitional Society: The Evolution of Participatory Planning in Serbia
Само за регистроване кориснике
2021
Поглавље у монографији (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Arnstein used the metaphor of a ladder to describe various examples of citizen participation—from securing political rights to obtaining economic justice. People would obtain greater influence for the places they live in by using types of participation with greater access to political authority. Organized civil disobedience and nonviolent protests proved useful in stopping bad redevelopment and highway projects. However, poor people were not integrated into political positions of influence; some other planning approaches (e.g., advocacy or equity planning) dealt with such efforts (Davidoff, 1965; Krumholz, Cogger, & Linner, 1975). Moreover, the global financial crisis of the 1970s affected the shift towards neoliberal governance, promoting competition. This designated a crisis for citizen participation, too. The neoliberals weakened the legitimacy and coherence of the state as an instrument for enhancing citizen sovereignty, while increasing divisions that enable elites to lobby for fa...vorable financial benefits. However, the social democracy in the US called for citizen participation again—in planning theory this resulted in the “communicative-argumentative turn” (Forester, 1989) and, therefore, the resurgence of Arnstein’s approach....
Кључне речи:
Citizen Participation / Integrated Planning / Participatory Planning / Centralized Planning / Market-Led Planning / Belgrade Waterfront ProjectИзвор:
Learning from Arnstein’s Ladder: From Citizen Participation to Public Engagement, 2021, 91-109Издавач:
- Routledge
Институција/група
Arhitektonski fakultetTY - CHAP AU - Perić, Ana PY - 2021 UR - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1346 AB - Arnstein used the metaphor of a ladder to describe various examples of citizen participation—from securing political rights to obtaining economic justice. People would obtain greater influence for the places they live in by using types of participation with greater access to political authority. Organized civil disobedience and nonviolent protests proved useful in stopping bad redevelopment and highway projects. However, poor people were not integrated into political positions of influence; some other planning approaches (e.g., advocacy or equity planning) dealt with such efforts (Davidoff, 1965; Krumholz, Cogger, & Linner, 1975). Moreover, the global financial crisis of the 1970s affected the shift towards neoliberal governance, promoting competition. This designated a crisis for citizen participation, too. The neoliberals weakened the legitimacy and coherence of the state as an instrument for enhancing citizen sovereignty, while increasing divisions that enable elites to lobby for favorable financial benefits. However, the social democracy in the US called for citizen participation again—in planning theory this resulted in the “communicative-argumentative turn” (Forester, 1989) and, therefore, the resurgence of Arnstein’s approach.... PB - Routledge T2 - Learning from Arnstein’s Ladder: From Citizen Participation to Public Engagement T1 - Citizen Participation in Transitional Society: The Evolution of Participatory Planning in Serbia SP - 91 EP - 109 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1346 ER -
@inbook{ author = "Perić, Ana", year = "2021", abstract = "Arnstein used the metaphor of a ladder to describe various examples of citizen participation—from securing political rights to obtaining economic justice. People would obtain greater influence for the places they live in by using types of participation with greater access to political authority. Organized civil disobedience and nonviolent protests proved useful in stopping bad redevelopment and highway projects. However, poor people were not integrated into political positions of influence; some other planning approaches (e.g., advocacy or equity planning) dealt with such efforts (Davidoff, 1965; Krumholz, Cogger, & Linner, 1975). Moreover, the global financial crisis of the 1970s affected the shift towards neoliberal governance, promoting competition. This designated a crisis for citizen participation, too. The neoliberals weakened the legitimacy and coherence of the state as an instrument for enhancing citizen sovereignty, while increasing divisions that enable elites to lobby for favorable financial benefits. However, the social democracy in the US called for citizen participation again—in planning theory this resulted in the “communicative-argumentative turn” (Forester, 1989) and, therefore, the resurgence of Arnstein’s approach....", publisher = "Routledge", journal = "Learning from Arnstein’s Ladder: From Citizen Participation to Public Engagement", booktitle = "Citizen Participation in Transitional Society: The Evolution of Participatory Planning in Serbia", pages = "91-109", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1346" }
Perić, A.. (2021). Citizen Participation in Transitional Society: The Evolution of Participatory Planning in Serbia. in Learning from Arnstein’s Ladder: From Citizen Participation to Public Engagement Routledge., 91-109. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1346
Perić A. Citizen Participation in Transitional Society: The Evolution of Participatory Planning in Serbia. in Learning from Arnstein’s Ladder: From Citizen Participation to Public Engagement. 2021;:91-109. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1346 .
Perić, Ana, "Citizen Participation in Transitional Society: The Evolution of Participatory Planning in Serbia" in Learning from Arnstein’s Ladder: From Citizen Participation to Public Engagement (2021):91-109, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1346 .