TY  - CONF
AU  - Tošković, Oliver
AU  - Kovač, Vladimir
AU  - Sovilj, Danira
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2138
AB  - The subjective experience of objects is usually investigated on photographs shown on a computer screen. Even when research is done on architectural objects, as stimuli researchers usually use their photographs. According to that, we might ask, would our subjective experience of certain
objects change if we observe it as a real threedimensional object or its two-dimensional projection on a photograph?
PB  - Sage Publications
C3  - Perception
T1  - Lost In Projection – Implicit Features Experience of 3D Architectural Forms and Their Projections
VL  - 50
IS  - 1 suppl
DO  - 10.1177/03010066211059887
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Tošković, Oliver and Kovač, Vladimir and Sovilj, Danira",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The subjective experience of objects is usually investigated on photographs shown on a computer screen. Even when research is done on architectural objects, as stimuli researchers usually use their photographs. According to that, we might ask, would our subjective experience of certain
objects change if we observe it as a real threedimensional object or its two-dimensional projection on a photograph?",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
journal = "Perception",
title = "Lost In Projection – Implicit Features Experience of 3D Architectural Forms and Their Projections",
volume = "50",
number = "1 suppl",
doi = "10.1177/03010066211059887"
}

Tošković, O., Kovač, V.,& Sovilj, D.. (2021). Lost In Projection – Implicit Features Experience of 3D Architectural Forms and Their Projections. in Perception
Sage Publications., 50(1 suppl).
https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066211059887

Tošković O, Kovač V, Sovilj D. Lost In Projection – Implicit Features Experience of 3D Architectural Forms and Their Projections. in Perception. 2021;50(1 suppl).
doi:10.1177/03010066211059887 .

Tošković, Oliver, Kovač, Vladimir, Sovilj, Danira, "Lost In Projection – Implicit Features Experience of 3D Architectural Forms and Their Projections" in Perception, 50, no. 1 suppl (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066211059887 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tošković, Oliver
AU  - Kovač, Vladimir
AU  - Sovilj, Danira
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1202
AB  - The aim of our study was to investigate whether the experience of objects’ implicit features would change if we
observe it as a real 3D object or as a photograph or a drawing. In our experiment 46 participants estimated their
impression of 10 objects shown in four different presentations. As stimuli, we used 3D objects, their virtual
reality models, photographs and drawings from four different viewing directions, created by architecture students.
As a measure of implicit features experience we used 12 bipolar adjectives grouped into four factors
(attractiveness, regularity, arousal, and calmness) and 3 adjectives forming aesthetic experience factor. Results
show significant differences between types of object presentations on four factors of implicit features experience,
but not on the aesthetic experience factor. Real 3D objects were experienced as more attractive and calm, while
VR presentation showed reduced arousal than other presentation types. On regularity VR and real 3D objects
were experienced as same and more regular then drawings and photographs.
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Acta Psychologica
T1  - Lost in projection – Implicit features experience of 3D architectural forms and their projections
VL  - 213
SP  - 103239
DO  - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103239
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Tošković, Oliver and Kovač, Vladimir and Sovilj, Danira",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The aim of our study was to investigate whether the experience of objects’ implicit features would change if we
observe it as a real 3D object or as a photograph or a drawing. In our experiment 46 participants estimated their
impression of 10 objects shown in four different presentations. As stimuli, we used 3D objects, their virtual
reality models, photographs and drawings from four different viewing directions, created by architecture students.
As a measure of implicit features experience we used 12 bipolar adjectives grouped into four factors
(attractiveness, regularity, arousal, and calmness) and 3 adjectives forming aesthetic experience factor. Results
show significant differences between types of object presentations on four factors of implicit features experience,
but not on the aesthetic experience factor. Real 3D objects were experienced as more attractive and calm, while
VR presentation showed reduced arousal than other presentation types. On regularity VR and real 3D objects
were experienced as same and more regular then drawings and photographs.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
title = "Lost in projection – Implicit features experience of 3D architectural forms and their projections",
volume = "213",
pages = "103239",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103239"
}

Tošković, O., Kovač, V.,& Sovilj, D.. (2021). Lost in projection – Implicit features experience of 3D architectural forms and their projections. in Acta Psychologica
Elsevier., 213, 103239.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103239

Tošković O, Kovač V, Sovilj D. Lost in projection – Implicit features experience of 3D architectural forms and their projections. in Acta Psychologica. 2021;213:103239.
doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103239 .

Tošković, Oliver, Kovač, Vladimir, Sovilj, Danira, "Lost in projection – Implicit features experience of 3D architectural forms and their projections" in Acta Psychologica, 213 (2021):103239,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103239 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Tošković, Oliver
AU  - Kovač, Vladimir
AU  - Sovilj, Danira
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2136
AB  - The subjective experience of various objects is usually investigated on photographs of
objects, or in case of art, on artistic pictures, shown as digital photographs on a computer
screen. Even when research is done on architectural objects, such as various types of
buildings, as stimuli researchers usually use photographs of those objects. According to that,
we might ask, would our subjective experience of certain objects change if we observe it as a
real three-dimensional object or its two-dimensional projection on a photograph? In our
experiment 46 psychology students estimated their subjective experience of 10 objects shown
in four different presentations.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of Psychology
PB  - Belgrade : Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade
C3  - XXVI Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 15 – 18th October, 2020
T1  - Virtual architecture – Subjective experience of virtual and real objects
SP  - 85
EP  - 85
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2136
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Tošković, Oliver and Kovač, Vladimir and Sovilj, Danira",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The subjective experience of various objects is usually investigated on photographs of
objects, or in case of art, on artistic pictures, shown as digital photographs on a computer
screen. Even when research is done on architectural objects, such as various types of
buildings, as stimuli researchers usually use photographs of those objects. According to that,
we might ask, would our subjective experience of certain objects change if we observe it as a
real three-dimensional object or its two-dimensional projection on a photograph? In our
experiment 46 psychology students estimated their subjective experience of 10 objects shown
in four different presentations.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute of Psychology, Belgrade : Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade",
journal = "XXVI Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 15 – 18th October, 2020",
title = "Virtual architecture – Subjective experience of virtual and real objects",
pages = "85-85",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2136"
}

Tošković, O., Kovač, V.,& Sovilj, D.. (2020). Virtual architecture – Subjective experience of virtual and real objects. in XXVI Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 15 – 18th October, 2020
Belgrade : Institute of Psychology., 85-85.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2136

Tošković O, Kovač V, Sovilj D. Virtual architecture – Subjective experience of virtual and real objects. in XXVI Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 15 – 18th October, 2020. 2020;:85-85.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2136 .

Tošković, Oliver, Kovač, Vladimir, Sovilj, Danira, "Virtual architecture – Subjective experience of virtual and real objects" in XXVI Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 15 – 18th October, 2020 (2020):85-85,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2136 .