TY  - JOUR
AU  - Živanović, Zora
AU  - Tošić, Branka
AU  - Berisha, Erblin
AU  - Perić, Ana
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1343
AB  - Since the end of the 1980s, several studies have been conducted aiming at understanding the heterogeneity of spatial planning traditions across Europe. Over the years, such studies became more comprehensive and included many European (and not only the European Union) countries. Nevertheless, some parts of Europe (e.g., the Western Balkans or the post-Soviet countries) usually remained excluded from the mentioned studies. To mitigate this gap, the paper focuses on the case of Russia. Using a twofold methodological approach, the paper firstly examines the attributes of Russian spatial planning (through a multi-layered analysis of the socio-economic and institutional settings, the evolution of spatial planning over a century, and contemporary planning instruments and procedures of plan-making), to then compare the attributes of the Russian spatial planning system to the core features of the European planning styles. As a result, the elements of multiple distinct spatial planning styles can be traced in Russian spatial planning: land use management and regional economic planning seem to prevail, whilst comprehensive integrated and urbanism traditions are less represented but not absent. Bearing in mind the complexity of the exercise, this contribution should be considered a preliminary attempt to enlarge the existing comparative studies beyond European countries.
PB  - Elsevier Ltd.
T2  - Land Use Policy
T1  - An attempt to locate the Russian spatial planning system within the European planning families
VL  - 127
SP  - 106591
DO  - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106591
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Živanović, Zora and Tošić, Branka and Berisha, Erblin and Perić, Ana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Since the end of the 1980s, several studies have been conducted aiming at understanding the heterogeneity of spatial planning traditions across Europe. Over the years, such studies became more comprehensive and included many European (and not only the European Union) countries. Nevertheless, some parts of Europe (e.g., the Western Balkans or the post-Soviet countries) usually remained excluded from the mentioned studies. To mitigate this gap, the paper focuses on the case of Russia. Using a twofold methodological approach, the paper firstly examines the attributes of Russian spatial planning (through a multi-layered analysis of the socio-economic and institutional settings, the evolution of spatial planning over a century, and contemporary planning instruments and procedures of plan-making), to then compare the attributes of the Russian spatial planning system to the core features of the European planning styles. As a result, the elements of multiple distinct spatial planning styles can be traced in Russian spatial planning: land use management and regional economic planning seem to prevail, whilst comprehensive integrated and urbanism traditions are less represented but not absent. Bearing in mind the complexity of the exercise, this contribution should be considered a preliminary attempt to enlarge the existing comparative studies beyond European countries.",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
title = "An attempt to locate the Russian spatial planning system within the European planning families",
volume = "127",
pages = "106591",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106591"
}

Živanović, Z., Tošić, B., Berisha, E.,& Perić, A.. (2023). An attempt to locate the Russian spatial planning system within the European planning families. in Land Use Policy
Elsevier Ltd.., 127, 106591.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106591

Živanović Z, Tošić B, Berisha E, Perić A. An attempt to locate the Russian spatial planning system within the European planning families. in Land Use Policy. 2023;127:106591.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106591 .

Živanović, Zora, Tošić, Branka, Berisha, Erblin, Perić, Ana, "An attempt to locate the Russian spatial planning system within the European planning families" in Land Use Policy, 127 (2023):106591,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106591 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Perić, Ana
AU  - Trkulja, Siniša
AU  - Živanović, Zora
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1332
AB  - As several Western Balkans countries aspire to become members of the European Union (EU) in the (near) future, it is interesting to explore to what extent EU territorial trends are adopted in both the official national regulations and spatial planning practice. To do so, we: 1) screen EU territorial policies to elucidate the trends and principles of territorial development, 2) analyse the contents of spatial plans in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, and 3) compare the practical application of the principles such as decentralisation, diffusion of power, subsidiarity, multi-actorship, synergy, transparency, citizen participation, coordinated action (among various disciplinary bodies), and holistic strategies. The findings show the ineffectiveness of declaratively adopted EU territorial trends against place-based territorial policy approaches.
PB  - Lodz University Press
T2  - European Spatial Research and Policy
T1  - From conformance to performance? A comparative analysis of the European Union territorial policy trends in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina.
VL  - 28
IS  - 2
SP  - 21
EP  - 41
DO  - 10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.02
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Perić, Ana and Trkulja, Siniša and Živanović, Zora",
year = "2021",
abstract = "As several Western Balkans countries aspire to become members of the European Union (EU) in the (near) future, it is interesting to explore to what extent EU territorial trends are adopted in both the official national regulations and spatial planning practice. To do so, we: 1) screen EU territorial policies to elucidate the trends and principles of territorial development, 2) analyse the contents of spatial plans in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, and 3) compare the practical application of the principles such as decentralisation, diffusion of power, subsidiarity, multi-actorship, synergy, transparency, citizen participation, coordinated action (among various disciplinary bodies), and holistic strategies. The findings show the ineffectiveness of declaratively adopted EU territorial trends against place-based territorial policy approaches.",
publisher = "Lodz University Press",
journal = "European Spatial Research and Policy",
title = "From conformance to performance? A comparative analysis of the European Union territorial policy trends in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina.",
volume = "28",
number = "2",
pages = "21-41",
doi = "10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.02"
}

Perić, A., Trkulja, S.,& Živanović, Z.. (2021). From conformance to performance? A comparative analysis of the European Union territorial policy trends in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina.. in European Spatial Research and Policy
Lodz University Press., 28(2), 21-41.
https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.02

Perić A, Trkulja S, Živanović Z. From conformance to performance? A comparative analysis of the European Union territorial policy trends in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina.. in European Spatial Research and Policy. 2021;28(2):21-41.
doi:10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.02 .

Perić, Ana, Trkulja, Siniša, Živanović, Zora, "From conformance to performance? A comparative analysis of the European Union territorial policy trends in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina." in European Spatial Research and Policy, 28, no. 2 (2021):21-41,
https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.28.2.02 . .