TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1770
AB  - As the first and most important institution, language institutionalizes all institutions, gives them the power to become disciplines and produce knowledge. In architectural theory and practice, language defines the processes of architectural design, while in architectural philosophy it reveals conceptualization and thematization. The main goal of this project is to extensively study architectural concepts. By introducing the philosophical text into the process of architectural design, this project aims to examine the relation between architectural concept (philosophy), architectural design (technology) and architectural project (process). Furthermore, this research will attempt to assemble an architectural dictionary of technical terms and notions, and then apply them to deconstruct architectural concepts.
PB  - Applied Research and Design Publishing (AR+D)
T2  - Innovation in practice in theory : positioning architectural design and its agency
T1  - Architecture and Terminology
SP  - 107
EP  - 117
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1770
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "As the first and most important institution, language institutionalizes all institutions, gives them the power to become disciplines and produce knowledge. In architectural theory and practice, language defines the processes of architectural design, while in architectural philosophy it reveals conceptualization and thematization. The main goal of this project is to extensively study architectural concepts. By introducing the philosophical text into the process of architectural design, this project aims to examine the relation between architectural concept (philosophy), architectural design (technology) and architectural project (process). Furthermore, this research will attempt to assemble an architectural dictionary of technical terms and notions, and then apply them to deconstruct architectural concepts.",
publisher = "Applied Research and Design Publishing (AR+D)",
journal = "Innovation in practice in theory : positioning architectural design and its agency",
booktitle = "Architecture and Terminology",
pages = "107-117",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1770"
}

Bojanić, P.,& Vesnić, S.. (2022). Architecture and Terminology. in Innovation in practice in theory : positioning architectural design and its agency
Applied Research and Design Publishing (AR+D)., 107-117.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1770

Bojanić P, Vesnić S. Architecture and Terminology. in Innovation in practice in theory : positioning architectural design and its agency. 2022;:107-117.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1770 .

Bojanić, Petar, Vesnić, Snežana, "Architecture and Terminology" in Innovation in practice in theory : positioning architectural design and its agency (2022):107-117,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1770 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Cvejić, Igor
AU  - Ćipranić, Miloš
AU  - Lošonc, Mark
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1365
AB  - Arhitektura je umetnost koja aficira najveći broj članova jedne zajednice. Stanovnici gradova ne mogu pobeći od nje ili barem to mogu učiniti privremeno. Neko bi mogao da kaže da život jednog grada, ljudi koji žive u njemu, može da se zamisli bez poezije, slikarstva ili filma, može da teče ili se održava bez njih, ali bez građevina, javnih ili privatnih - socijalnog gesta arhitekte ili arhitekture - to je nemoguće. Sve one skupa, u totalitetu, sublimiraju, određuju i štite egzistenciju jedne društvene zajednice.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet
T2  - Živeti zajedno
T1  - Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice
SP  - 375
EP  - 381
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1365
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Cvejić, Igor and Ćipranić, Miloš and Lošonc, Mark and Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Arhitektura je umetnost koja aficira najveći broj članova jedne zajednice. Stanovnici gradova ne mogu pobeći od nje ili barem to mogu učiniti privremeno. Neko bi mogao da kaže da život jednog grada, ljudi koji žive u njemu, može da se zamisli bez poezije, slikarstva ili filma, može da teče ili se održava bez njih, ali bez građevina, javnih ili privatnih - socijalnog gesta arhitekte ili arhitekture - to je nemoguće. Sve one skupa, u totalitetu, sublimiraju, određuju i štite egzistenciju jedne društvene zajednice.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet",
journal = "Živeti zajedno",
booktitle = "Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice",
pages = "375-381",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1365"
}

Bojanić, P., Cvejić, I., Ćipranić, M., Lošonc, M.,& Vesnić, S.. (2019). Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice. in Živeti zajedno
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet., 375-381.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1365

Bojanić P, Cvejić I, Ćipranić M, Lošonc M, Vesnić S. Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice. in Živeti zajedno. 2019;:375-381.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1365 .

Bojanić, Petar, Cvejić, Igor, Ćipranić, Miloš, Lošonc, Mark, Vesnić, Snežana, "Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice" in Živeti zajedno (2019):375-381,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1365 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Đokić, Vladan
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/983
AB  - This paper is the result of collaborative work and joint construction. Our intention is to explain the utterly uncertain and always debatable connection between architecture and philosophy. Namely, this is an elucidation of the reconstruction of the connection between philosophy or theory on the one hand, and architecture on the other, by making reference and explaining “The Architectural Philosophy” (Eisenman’s concept), thereby introducing a few premises that would regulate the status and form of the copula “and” between these respective fields. The first premise could regard the various kinds of inspiration that philosophy or theory has produced in the field of architecture, or even the results of various encounters and dialogues between philosophers and architects. Indeed, today the philosopher is awakened in the architect. On the other hand, it seems to us, and this is our second premise, that it is indeed possible to explain the uncertainty of the encounter between an architect and a philosopher through the example of their collaboration or exchange.
AB  - Gli autori intendono proporre le premesse necessarie al chiarimento del rapporto, incerto e da sempre dibattuto, che lega architettura e filosofia attraverso il riferimento al concetto di “Filosofia architettonica” proposto da Peter Eisenman. Una prima premessa riguarda le varie tipologie di approccio alla filosofia riscontrabili nel campo dell’architettura, fino a delineare una forma di consapevolezza filosofica nell’architettura contemporanea. La seconda premessa riguarda la possibilità di spiegare il rapporto tra filosofia e architettura attraverso i casi di collaborazione concreta tra architetti e filosofi.
PB  - Rosenberg & Sellier
T2  - Rivista di estetica
T1  - La filosofia architettonica
IS  - 58
SP  - 81
EP  - 88
DO  - 10.4000/estetica.427
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Đokić, Vladan",
year = "2015",
abstract = "This paper is the result of collaborative work and joint construction. Our intention is to explain the utterly uncertain and always debatable connection between architecture and philosophy. Namely, this is an elucidation of the reconstruction of the connection between philosophy or theory on the one hand, and architecture on the other, by making reference and explaining “The Architectural Philosophy” (Eisenman’s concept), thereby introducing a few premises that would regulate the status and form of the copula “and” between these respective fields. The first premise could regard the various kinds of inspiration that philosophy or theory has produced in the field of architecture, or even the results of various encounters and dialogues between philosophers and architects. Indeed, today the philosopher is awakened in the architect. On the other hand, it seems to us, and this is our second premise, that it is indeed possible to explain the uncertainty of the encounter between an architect and a philosopher through the example of their collaboration or exchange., Gli autori intendono proporre le premesse necessarie al chiarimento del rapporto, incerto e da sempre dibattuto, che lega architettura e filosofia attraverso il riferimento al concetto di “Filosofia architettonica” proposto da Peter Eisenman. Una prima premessa riguarda le varie tipologie di approccio alla filosofia riscontrabili nel campo dell’architettura, fino a delineare una forma di consapevolezza filosofica nell’architettura contemporanea. La seconda premessa riguarda la possibilità di spiegare il rapporto tra filosofia e architettura attraverso i casi di collaborazione concreta tra architetti e filosofi.",
publisher = "Rosenberg & Sellier",
journal = "Rivista di estetica",
title = "La filosofia architettonica",
number = "58",
pages = "81-88",
doi = "10.4000/estetica.427"
}

Bojanić, P.,& Đokić, V.. (2015). La filosofia architettonica. in Rivista di estetica
Rosenberg & Sellier.(58), 81-88.
https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.427

Bojanić P, Đokić V. La filosofia architettonica. in Rivista di estetica. 2015;(58):81-88.
doi:10.4000/estetica.427 .

Bojanić, Petar, Đokić, Vladan, "La filosofia architettonica" in Rivista di estetica, no. 58 (2015):81-88,
https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.427 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Djokić, Vladan
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/984
AB  - Deleuze uses l'institution revolutionnaire in his texts, certainly completely aware that this phrase has a quite chaotic and vague history during post-revolutionary periods, but also that it is perfectly in the spirit of Saint-Just's intentions. We investigate whether this phrase best describes Deleuze's imaginary theory of the institution, as well as his engagement with the theory more generally. The preliminary difficulty, which immediately questions and devalues such a commentary, is Deleuze's own refusal to thematize the institution and his own effort, and thus actually answer his own questions from the 1950s: what is it that explains the institution? And what should perfect institutions be like, that is, ones opposed to all agreement, and which suppose a minimum of laws? Deleuze's carelessness and effectively his abandonment of his own early attempt at thinking the institution, could possibly mark his intuition and recognition that the thematization of the institution is, as of yet, an impossible task.
PB  - Ljubljana : Filozofski inštitut ZRC SAZU
T2  - Filozofski vestnik
T1  - "L'institution révolutionnaire" O "prevratu", nasilju in instituciji pri Gillesu Deleuzu
VL  - XXXII
IS  - 1
SP  - 223
EP  - 234
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_984
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Djokić, Vladan",
year = "2011",
abstract = "Deleuze uses l'institution revolutionnaire in his texts, certainly completely aware that this phrase has a quite chaotic and vague history during post-revolutionary periods, but also that it is perfectly in the spirit of Saint-Just's intentions. We investigate whether this phrase best describes Deleuze's imaginary theory of the institution, as well as his engagement with the theory more generally. The preliminary difficulty, which immediately questions and devalues such a commentary, is Deleuze's own refusal to thematize the institution and his own effort, and thus actually answer his own questions from the 1950s: what is it that explains the institution? And what should perfect institutions be like, that is, ones opposed to all agreement, and which suppose a minimum of laws? Deleuze's carelessness and effectively his abandonment of his own early attempt at thinking the institution, could possibly mark his intuition and recognition that the thematization of the institution is, as of yet, an impossible task.",
publisher = "Ljubljana : Filozofski inštitut ZRC SAZU",
journal = "Filozofski vestnik",
title = ""L'institution révolutionnaire" O "prevratu", nasilju in instituciji pri Gillesu Deleuzu",
volume = "XXXII",
number = "1",
pages = "223-234",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_984"
}

Bojanić, P.,& Djokić, V.. (2011). "L'institution révolutionnaire" O "prevratu", nasilju in instituciji pri Gillesu Deleuzu. in Filozofski vestnik
Ljubljana : Filozofski inštitut ZRC SAZU., XXXII(1), 223-234.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_984

Bojanić P, Djokić V. "L'institution révolutionnaire" O "prevratu", nasilju in instituciji pri Gillesu Deleuzu. in Filozofski vestnik. 2011;XXXII(1):223-234.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_984 .

Bojanić, Petar, Djokić, Vladan, ""L'institution révolutionnaire" O "prevratu", nasilju in instituciji pri Gillesu Deleuzu" in Filozofski vestnik, XXXII, no. 1 (2011):223-234,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_984 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Đokić, Vladan
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/99
AB  - We should investigate whether the phrase l'institution révolutionnaire best describes Deleuze's imaginary theory of the institution, as well as his engagement with the theory more generally. The preliminary difficulty, which immediately questions and devalues our commentary, is Deleuze's own refusal to thematize the institution and his own effort, and thus actually answer his own questions from the 1950s: what is it that explains the institution? And what should perfect institutions be like, that is, ones opposed to all agreement, and which suppose a minimum of laws? Deleuze's carelessness and effectively his abandonment of his own early attempt at thinking the institution, could possibly mark his intuition and recognition that the thematization of the institution is, as of yet, an impossible task.
AB  - Interesuje nas, prednost koju Delez daje sintagmi 'revolucionarna institucija' u odnosu na manje originalnu sintagmu 'institucionalna revolucija'. Delez nekoliko puta upotrebljava u svojim tekstovima 'revolucionarna institucija', sigurno sasvim svestan da ova sintagma ima jednu prilično haotičnu i nejasnu istoriju tokom post-revolucionarnog perioda, ali i da je ona savršeno u duhu Sanžistovih namera. Treba da proverimo da li ova sintagma najbolje opisuje jednu Delezovu imaginarnu teoriju institucije, ali i njegov angažman u teoriji uopšte. Preeliminarna teškoća, koja automatski dovodi u pitanje i devalvira našu intervenciju, jeste Delezovo odbijanje da on sâm zaista tematizuje instituciju i svoj napor, te da zaista odgovori na pitanja koja sâm postavlja pedesetih godina prošlog veka: 'šta je to što objašnjava instituciju?' i 'koje bi to trebalo da budu savršene institucije, to jest one koje se suprotstavljaju svakom ugovoru i pretpostavljaju tek najmanji broj zakona?'.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Of 'reversal,' on revolutional: Violence and the institution
T1  - O 'prevrtanju', o revolucionarnom - nasilje i institucija
VL  - 22
IS  - 2
SP  - 157
EP  - 171
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_99
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Đokić, Vladan",
year = "2011",
abstract = "We should investigate whether the phrase l'institution révolutionnaire best describes Deleuze's imaginary theory of the institution, as well as his engagement with the theory more generally. The preliminary difficulty, which immediately questions and devalues our commentary, is Deleuze's own refusal to thematize the institution and his own effort, and thus actually answer his own questions from the 1950s: what is it that explains the institution? And what should perfect institutions be like, that is, ones opposed to all agreement, and which suppose a minimum of laws? Deleuze's carelessness and effectively his abandonment of his own early attempt at thinking the institution, could possibly mark his intuition and recognition that the thematization of the institution is, as of yet, an impossible task., Interesuje nas, prednost koju Delez daje sintagmi 'revolucionarna institucija' u odnosu na manje originalnu sintagmu 'institucionalna revolucija'. Delez nekoliko puta upotrebljava u svojim tekstovima 'revolucionarna institucija', sigurno sasvim svestan da ova sintagma ima jednu prilično haotičnu i nejasnu istoriju tokom post-revolucionarnog perioda, ali i da je ona savršeno u duhu Sanžistovih namera. Treba da proverimo da li ova sintagma najbolje opisuje jednu Delezovu imaginarnu teoriju institucije, ali i njegov angažman u teoriji uopšte. Preeliminarna teškoća, koja automatski dovodi u pitanje i devalvira našu intervenciju, jeste Delezovo odbijanje da on sâm zaista tematizuje instituciju i svoj napor, te da zaista odgovori na pitanja koja sâm postavlja pedesetih godina prošlog veka: 'šta je to što objašnjava instituciju?' i 'koje bi to trebalo da budu savršene institucije, to jest one koje se suprotstavljaju svakom ugovoru i pretpostavljaju tek najmanji broj zakona?'.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Of 'reversal,' on revolutional: Violence and the institution, O 'prevrtanju', o revolucionarnom - nasilje i institucija",
volume = "22",
number = "2",
pages = "157-171",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_99"
}

Bojanić, P.,& Đokić, V.. (2011). Of 'reversal,' on revolutional: Violence and the institution. in Filozofija i društvo
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd., 22(2), 157-171.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_99

Bojanić P, Đokić V. Of 'reversal,' on revolutional: Violence and the institution. in Filozofija i društvo. 2011;22(2):157-171.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_99 .

Bojanić, Petar, Đokić, Vladan, "Of 'reversal,' on revolutional: Violence and the institution" in Filozofija i društvo, 22, no. 2 (2011):157-171,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_99 .