Vesnić, S.,& Milenković, V.. (2023). Konkurs za idejno arhitektonsko-urbanističko rješenje lokacije novog groblja u Beranama [otkup]. in Konkurs za idejno arhitektonsko-urbanističko rješenje objekta – novo gradsko groblje u Beranama.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2049

Vesnić S, Milenković V. Konkurs za idejno arhitektonsko-urbanističko rješenje lokacije novog groblja u Beranama [otkup]. in Konkurs za idejno arhitektonsko-urbanističko rješenje objekta – novo gradsko groblje u Beranama. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2049 .

Vesnić, Snežana, Milenković, Vladimir, "Konkurs za idejno arhitektonsko-urbanističko rješenje lokacije novog groblja u Beranama [otkup]" in Konkurs za idejno arhitektonsko-urbanističko rješenje objekta – novo gradsko groblje u Beranama (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2049 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1991
AB  - The paper offers a theoretical basis for understanding the design methodology of the Villa Pavlović project (by the Belgrade-based architecture studio NEO arhitekti). The theoretical analysis of the design process focuses on the issue of form. The initial idea to build a 50-meter swim lane in the basement gave the house an elongated form, but was ultimately not realised. The moment the form lost its main function, its finitude became a problem that had to be overcome for the design process to continue. By reflecting on the theoretical problems of teleology and time, the text indirectly explains the applied methodology for the destabilisation of the created form. In that sense, a metaphor of dissolution of gold describes the design process, potentially understood as opposite to morphogenesis.
PB  - Quodlibet
T2  - Vesper. Journal of Architecture, Arts & Theory
T1  - Villa Pavlović and the Dissolution of Gold
IS  - 8
SP  - 42
EP  - 51
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1991
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The paper offers a theoretical basis for understanding the design methodology of the Villa Pavlović project (by the Belgrade-based architecture studio NEO arhitekti). The theoretical analysis of the design process focuses on the issue of form. The initial idea to build a 50-meter swim lane in the basement gave the house an elongated form, but was ultimately not realised. The moment the form lost its main function, its finitude became a problem that had to be overcome for the design process to continue. By reflecting on the theoretical problems of teleology and time, the text indirectly explains the applied methodology for the destabilisation of the created form. In that sense, a metaphor of dissolution of gold describes the design process, potentially understood as opposite to morphogenesis.",
publisher = "Quodlibet",
journal = "Vesper. Journal of Architecture, Arts & Theory",
title = "Villa Pavlović and the Dissolution of Gold",
number = "8",
pages = "42-51",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1991"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2023). Villa Pavlović and the Dissolution of Gold. in Vesper. Journal of Architecture, Arts & Theory
Quodlibet.(8), 42-51.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1991

Vesnić S. Villa Pavlović and the Dissolution of Gold. in Vesper. Journal of Architecture, Arts & Theory. 2023;(8):42-51.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1991 .

Vesnić, Snežana, "Villa Pavlović and the Dissolution of Gold" in Vesper. Journal of Architecture, Arts & Theory, no. 8 (2023):42-51,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1991 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1987
AB  - From the linguistic aspect, “/” does not represent the concept for “both.” Instead, it refers to the field of alternatives between “two;” therefore, it excludes absolute conjunction. Concerning the process of design of the architectural object, I will try to explain the successive morphogeneses of the architectural form and the formless through which we generate a specific resistance of architecture to philosophy and vice versa. The architectural object is immanent to the formless in order to stop time, that is, its own finitude (end). Thus, the formless refers to what negates form as the principle of stable order and harmonious continuity and opposes form in its material becoming. This opposition to the own materialization of the object represents a metaphor for the desire for aesthetics that includes a non-representational (philosophical) dimension. The formless introduces a conceptual dimension to architecture, which is why I associate formless with the process of the creation of an object at the same time as its disappearance. In addition, according to Didi-Huberman, formlessness is not a rejection of form but precisely the possibility of reaching figuration. When the form dissolves into the formless and the formless changes into the form, the architectural concept becomes “burdened” by its own negativity, the desire for a non-substantial dynamic l’informe, and also the desire for figures that contain something non-imaginable. In this regard, l’informe methodologically belongs to philosophy because it deconstructs the materiality of the architectural object. However, paradoxically, it can also serve as a design of architectural figures. These states of the impossibility of absolute conjunction of philosophy and architecture create contingencies for new architectural concepts.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade
C3  - Book of Abstracts : Architecture / Philosophy : 6th Summer School Architecture and Philosophy, June 26-28, Cres, Croatia
T1  - Philosophy “/” Architecture: Against l’informe
SP  - 11
EP  - 11
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1987
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "From the linguistic aspect, “/” does not represent the concept for “both.” Instead, it refers to the field of alternatives between “two;” therefore, it excludes absolute conjunction. Concerning the process of design of the architectural object, I will try to explain the successive morphogeneses of the architectural form and the formless through which we generate a specific resistance of architecture to philosophy and vice versa. The architectural object is immanent to the formless in order to stop time, that is, its own finitude (end). Thus, the formless refers to what negates form as the principle of stable order and harmonious continuity and opposes form in its material becoming. This opposition to the own materialization of the object represents a metaphor for the desire for aesthetics that includes a non-representational (philosophical) dimension. The formless introduces a conceptual dimension to architecture, which is why I associate formless with the process of the creation of an object at the same time as its disappearance. In addition, according to Didi-Huberman, formlessness is not a rejection of form but precisely the possibility of reaching figuration. When the form dissolves into the formless and the formless changes into the form, the architectural concept becomes “burdened” by its own negativity, the desire for a non-substantial dynamic l’informe, and also the desire for figures that contain something non-imaginable. In this regard, l’informe methodologically belongs to philosophy because it deconstructs the materiality of the architectural object. However, paradoxically, it can also serve as a design of architectural figures. These states of the impossibility of absolute conjunction of philosophy and architecture create contingencies for new architectural concepts.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade",
journal = "Book of Abstracts : Architecture / Philosophy : 6th Summer School Architecture and Philosophy, June 26-28, Cres, Croatia",
title = "Philosophy “/” Architecture: Against l’informe",
pages = "11-11",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1987"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2023). Philosophy “/” Architecture: Against l’informe. in Book of Abstracts : Architecture / Philosophy : 6th Summer School Architecture and Philosophy, June 26-28, Cres, Croatia
Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade., 11-11.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1987

Vesnić S. Philosophy “/” Architecture: Against l’informe. in Book of Abstracts : Architecture / Philosophy : 6th Summer School Architecture and Philosophy, June 26-28, Cres, Croatia. 2023;:11-11.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1987 .

Vesnić, Snežana, "Philosophy “/” Architecture: Against l’informe" in Book of Abstracts : Architecture / Philosophy : 6th Summer School Architecture and Philosophy, June 26-28, Cres, Croatia (2023):11-11,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1987 .

Vesnić, S.,& Milenković, V.. (2022). Idejno rešenje nove zgrade Fakulteta muzičke umetnosti u Beogradu [druga nagrada]. 
Udruženje arhitekata Srbije..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2057

Vesnić S, Milenković V. Idejno rešenje nove zgrade Fakulteta muzičke umetnosti u Beogradu [druga nagrada]. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2057 .

Vesnić, Snežana, Milenković, Vladimir, "Idejno rešenje nove zgrade Fakulteta muzičke umetnosti u Beogradu [druga nagrada]" (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2057 .

Vesnić, S.,& Milenković, V.. (2022). Vinča : Prvo moderno doba [otkup]. in Javni međunarodni urbanističko-arhitektonski konkurs za uređenje Arheološkog parka Belo brdo sa idejnim rešenjem objekata centra za posetioce i naučnoistraživačkog centra u Vinči
Udruženje arhitekata Srbije..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2053

Vesnić S, Milenković V. Vinča : Prvo moderno doba [otkup]. in Javni međunarodni urbanističko-arhitektonski konkurs za uređenje Arheološkog parka Belo brdo sa idejnim rešenjem objekata centra za posetioce i naučnoistraživačkog centra u Vinči. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2053 .

Vesnić, Snežana, Milenković, Vladimir, "Vinča : Prvo moderno doba [otkup]" in Javni međunarodni urbanističko-arhitektonski konkurs za uređenje Arheološkog parka Belo brdo sa idejnim rešenjem objekata centra za posetioce i naučnoistraživačkog centra u Vinči (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2053 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1988
AB  - Following Lyotard’s deconstruction of the opposition between the discursive and the figural, the
construction “philosophy of architectural figures” would include the intention to depart from the
problem of order between the two. If, instead of the question what is discursive in the figural or
what is figural of the discursive, the question of the “whole” is asked, then the meaning of the
position “between” the discourse and the figure – the discursive content and the figural materiality
– would be found in what resists (discursive and/or figural) representation. Architecturally
speaking, we can always talk about the conceptual materiality or the projected immateriality of
architectural figures. The figure tends to elude discourse or mere representation through the
philosophy of concepts. But it also insists on the simultaneous presence of the textual. The
play between the materiality of language (which cannot be reduced to the phenomenological)
and the certain phenomenology of the figure (which cannot be fully translated into linguistic
concepts) is close to “desire” itself. More precisely, it becomes the most extreme form of desire.
The idea to speak simultaneously about the absence of the figurative in figuration and the textual
presence by the “body of words” – through a series of short sequences, that is, figures – is close
to Lyotard’s comma between the discourse and figure. By dividing or linking the two words, this
comma introduces an element of “incommensurability” that seeks to insinuate the radicality that
allowed the term “figure” to enter the discourse. On the other hand, placing a comma begins the
deconstruction of the word figure. This is why we construct sequences with “commas” that do not
aim to explain anything but to inspire philosophers to see architectural figures. At the same time,
these sequences open up the possibility for the architect to assign movement to architectural
figures through the body of words. The idea to use text for confirming architectural possibility
of the final materiality of the architectural concept at the same time represents an opportunity
for philosophy to explore the materiality of words. Invoking what cannot be represented, the
figural destabilizes the boundaries of the representable, that is, the boundaries of the discursive,
striving to finally merge with it.
PB  - Belgrade : STRAND - Sustainable Urban Society Association
C3  - Philosophy of Architecture : book of abstracts / [Tenth International Multimedia Event] On Architecture, Belgrade 2022]
T1  - Philosophy of Architectural Figures
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1988
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Following Lyotard’s deconstruction of the opposition between the discursive and the figural, the
construction “philosophy of architectural figures” would include the intention to depart from the
problem of order between the two. If, instead of the question what is discursive in the figural or
what is figural of the discursive, the question of the “whole” is asked, then the meaning of the
position “between” the discourse and the figure – the discursive content and the figural materiality
– would be found in what resists (discursive and/or figural) representation. Architecturally
speaking, we can always talk about the conceptual materiality or the projected immateriality of
architectural figures. The figure tends to elude discourse or mere representation through the
philosophy of concepts. But it also insists on the simultaneous presence of the textual. The
play between the materiality of language (which cannot be reduced to the phenomenological)
and the certain phenomenology of the figure (which cannot be fully translated into linguistic
concepts) is close to “desire” itself. More precisely, it becomes the most extreme form of desire.
The idea to speak simultaneously about the absence of the figurative in figuration and the textual
presence by the “body of words” – through a series of short sequences, that is, figures – is close
to Lyotard’s comma between the discourse and figure. By dividing or linking the two words, this
comma introduces an element of “incommensurability” that seeks to insinuate the radicality that
allowed the term “figure” to enter the discourse. On the other hand, placing a comma begins the
deconstruction of the word figure. This is why we construct sequences with “commas” that do not
aim to explain anything but to inspire philosophers to see architectural figures. At the same time,
these sequences open up the possibility for the architect to assign movement to architectural
figures through the body of words. The idea to use text for confirming architectural possibility
of the final materiality of the architectural concept at the same time represents an opportunity
for philosophy to explore the materiality of words. Invoking what cannot be represented, the
figural destabilizes the boundaries of the representable, that is, the boundaries of the discursive,
striving to finally merge with it.",
publisher = "Belgrade : STRAND - Sustainable Urban Society Association",
journal = "Philosophy of Architecture : book of abstracts / [Tenth International Multimedia Event] On Architecture, Belgrade 2022]",
title = "Philosophy of Architectural Figures",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1988"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2022). Philosophy of Architectural Figures. in Philosophy of Architecture : book of abstracts / [Tenth International Multimedia Event] On Architecture, Belgrade 2022]
Belgrade : STRAND - Sustainable Urban Society Association..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1988

Vesnić S. Philosophy of Architectural Figures. in Philosophy of Architecture : book of abstracts / [Tenth International Multimedia Event] On Architecture, Belgrade 2022]. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1988 .

Vesnić, Snežana, "Philosophy of Architectural Figures" in Philosophy of Architecture : book of abstracts / [Tenth International Multimedia Event] On Architecture, Belgrade 2022] (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1988 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1989
AB  - In this text, I thematize the creation of the (architectural) concept and creation with
the concept, in order to present a new argument that the production of the object of
architecture is a consequence of the creation by concept. The concept translates one
form of reality into another. In these deconstructions of reality and the object, we find
the potential for ever-novel creation and an always new reality. In the changes of modes
of reality, the object always has a new reality. The non-identity created among various
forms of existence of a single object creates new ‘potency’ for new objective reality. In
the text, I present the phrase “surréalité virtuelle” to express my idea of the creation of the
new conceptual potential at the point of absence, lack, or inexistence of the architectural
object.
PB  - Applied Research and Design Publishing (AR+D)
T2  - Innovation in Practice in Theory: Positioning Architectural Design and Its Agency
T1  - Time and Technology of the Architectural Concept: (Sur)réalité Virtuelle
SP  - 55
EP  - 65
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1989
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "In this text, I thematize the creation of the (architectural) concept and creation with
the concept, in order to present a new argument that the production of the object of
architecture is a consequence of the creation by concept. The concept translates one
form of reality into another. In these deconstructions of reality and the object, we find
the potential for ever-novel creation and an always new reality. In the changes of modes
of reality, the object always has a new reality. The non-identity created among various
forms of existence of a single object creates new ‘potency’ for new objective reality. In
the text, I present the phrase “surréalité virtuelle” to express my idea of the creation of the
new conceptual potential at the point of absence, lack, or inexistence of the architectural
object.",
publisher = "Applied Research and Design Publishing (AR+D)",
journal = "Innovation in Practice in Theory: Positioning Architectural Design and Its Agency",
booktitle = "Time and Technology of the Architectural Concept: (Sur)réalité Virtuelle",
pages = "55-65",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1989"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2022). Time and Technology of the Architectural Concept: (Sur)réalité Virtuelle. in Innovation in Practice in Theory: Positioning Architectural Design and Its Agency
Applied Research and Design Publishing (AR+D)., 55-65.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1989

Vesnić S. Time and Technology of the Architectural Concept: (Sur)réalité Virtuelle. in Innovation in Practice in Theory: Positioning Architectural Design and Its Agency. 2022;:55-65.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1989 .

Vesnić, Snežana, "Time and Technology of the Architectural Concept: (Sur)réalité Virtuelle" in Innovation in Practice in Theory: Positioning Architectural Design and Its Agency (2022):55-65,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1989 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1985
AB  - My intention is to distinguish between the new and novelty. Using the impossibility of projective difference defined (made, determined) by the other and the third, I will elaborate a deconstruction of the creation of the “new”. As the other appears from the possibility of difference, invention is a discovery (in what already exists) of the other. If Derrida placed the appearance of the other outside the methodological procedure, thus projecting (designing) deconstruction above all as a “metaphysical project” with explicitly phenomenological projection, we can claim that, upon the invention of the other (the new), we must also produce “the third”, as inspiration of real creation (novelty). Invention is not the same as creation, but refers to alteration (movement, change) of what already exists through qualitative openness to other readings. The other is the projection of openness, or the other is what contains a “projection”. Distinct from the “new”, novelty is pure creation, that is, it refers to the concept. Thus, the other could be said to belong to the project, that is, it is a projection that constructs a new object, opens it and places it into reality. “The Third” is an unstable position that emerges from the constant tension between what exists and what is thought. This uncertainty could manifest “something” entirely novel, beyond projective geometry, which aims to oppose deconstruction with the “perfect” or “ideal” structure. The new is thus equated with invention, that is, the project; while novelty relates to the concept. Since the concept mediates between architecture and philosophy, and as novelty is essentially the future of the discipline, then the concept – the conjunction AND – contains the contingency of the third: the possibility of novelty for the new.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade
C3  - Book of abstracts : the Project of Theory, 3-7 May, Cres, Croatia
T1  - And. The Invention (Projection) of the Third
SP  - 17
EP  - 17
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1985
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "My intention is to distinguish between the new and novelty. Using the impossibility of projective difference defined (made, determined) by the other and the third, I will elaborate a deconstruction of the creation of the “new”. As the other appears from the possibility of difference, invention is a discovery (in what already exists) of the other. If Derrida placed the appearance of the other outside the methodological procedure, thus projecting (designing) deconstruction above all as a “metaphysical project” with explicitly phenomenological projection, we can claim that, upon the invention of the other (the new), we must also produce “the third”, as inspiration of real creation (novelty). Invention is not the same as creation, but refers to alteration (movement, change) of what already exists through qualitative openness to other readings. The other is the projection of openness, or the other is what contains a “projection”. Distinct from the “new”, novelty is pure creation, that is, it refers to the concept. Thus, the other could be said to belong to the project, that is, it is a projection that constructs a new object, opens it and places it into reality. “The Third” is an unstable position that emerges from the constant tension between what exists and what is thought. This uncertainty could manifest “something” entirely novel, beyond projective geometry, which aims to oppose deconstruction with the “perfect” or “ideal” structure. The new is thus equated with invention, that is, the project; while novelty relates to the concept. Since the concept mediates between architecture and philosophy, and as novelty is essentially the future of the discipline, then the concept – the conjunction AND – contains the contingency of the third: the possibility of novelty for the new.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade",
journal = "Book of abstracts : the Project of Theory, 3-7 May, Cres, Croatia",
title = "And. The Invention (Projection) of the Third",
pages = "17-17",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1985"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2022). And. The Invention (Projection) of the Third. in Book of abstracts : the Project of Theory, 3-7 May, Cres, Croatia
Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade., 17-17.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1985

Vesnić S. And. The Invention (Projection) of the Third. in Book of abstracts : the Project of Theory, 3-7 May, Cres, Croatia. 2022;:17-17.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1985 .

Vesnić, Snežana, "And. The Invention (Projection) of the Third" in Book of abstracts : the Project of Theory, 3-7 May, Cres, Croatia (2022):17-17,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1985 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1770
AB  - As the first and most important institution, language institutionalizes all institutions, gives them the power to become disciplines and produce knowledge. In architectural theory and practice, language defines the processes of architectural design, while in architectural philosophy it reveals conceptualization and thematization. The main goal of this project is to extensively study architectural concepts. By introducing the philosophical text into the process of architectural design, this project aims to examine the relation between architectural concept (philosophy), architectural design (technology) and architectural project (process). Furthermore, this research will attempt to assemble an architectural dictionary of technical terms and notions, and then apply them to deconstruct architectural concepts.
PB  - Applied Research and Design Publishing (AR+D)
T2  - Innovation in practice in theory : positioning architectural design and its agency
T1  - Architecture and Terminology
SP  - 107
EP  - 117
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1770
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "As the first and most important institution, language institutionalizes all institutions, gives them the power to become disciplines and produce knowledge. In architectural theory and practice, language defines the processes of architectural design, while in architectural philosophy it reveals conceptualization and thematization. The main goal of this project is to extensively study architectural concepts. By introducing the philosophical text into the process of architectural design, this project aims to examine the relation between architectural concept (philosophy), architectural design (technology) and architectural project (process). Furthermore, this research will attempt to assemble an architectural dictionary of technical terms and notions, and then apply them to deconstruct architectural concepts.",
publisher = "Applied Research and Design Publishing (AR+D)",
journal = "Innovation in practice in theory : positioning architectural design and its agency",
booktitle = "Architecture and Terminology",
pages = "107-117",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1770"
}

Bojanić, P.,& Vesnić, S.. (2022). Architecture and Terminology. in Innovation in practice in theory : positioning architectural design and its agency
Applied Research and Design Publishing (AR+D)., 107-117.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1770

Bojanić P, Vesnić S. Architecture and Terminology. in Innovation in practice in theory : positioning architectural design and its agency. 2022;:107-117.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1770 .

Bojanić, Petar, Vesnić, Snežana, "Architecture and Terminology" in Innovation in practice in theory : positioning architectural design and its agency (2022):107-117,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1770 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://philpapers.org/rec/VESDBP
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1358
AB  - Odgovor na pitanje o tome postoji li napetost između uvida da nam koncept dispozitiva otkriva promjenljivost objektivne stvarnosti i teorije da projektiranje arhitektonskog objekta
zavisi od različitih elemenata koji su obuhvaćeni konceptom dispozitiva. Glavna je teza
ovoga članka da primjena dispozitiva u polju arhitekture pomaže boljem razumijevanju tog
koncepta – od Michela Foucaulta, preko Gillesa Deleuzea do Giorgia Agambena. U članku iznosim argumente u prilog tvrdnji da se nestabilan filozofski koncept dispositifa može
precizirati iskustvima arhitektonske prakse i teorije. Pokazat ću ne samo zašto je arhitektu
potrebna filozofija nego i obratno, zašto arhitekt i njegova praksa mogu pomoći filozofima.
AB  - The answer to the question of whether there is a tension between the insight that the concept of dispositif reveals to us the variability of objective reality and the theory that the design of an architectural object depends on the various elements captured by the concept of dispositif The primary thesis of this paper is that the application of dispositifs in the field of architecture helps us to better understand this concept – from Michel Foucault to Gilles Deleuze to Giorgio Agamben. In other words, the paper presents arguments that the unstable philosophical concept of dispositif can be made more precise through the experiences of architectural practice and theory. On this occasion, I would like to show not only why architects need philosophy, but also, conversely, how an architect and his practice can help philosophers.
PB  - Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Filozofska Istrazivanja
T1  - Dispositif između filozofske kategorije i arhitektonskog koncepta
T1  - Dispositif between Philosophical Category and Architectural Concept
VL  - 42
IS  - 4
SP  - 821
EP  - 832
DO  - 10.21464/fi42410
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Odgovor na pitanje o tome postoji li napetost između uvida da nam koncept dispozitiva otkriva promjenljivost objektivne stvarnosti i teorije da projektiranje arhitektonskog objekta
zavisi od različitih elemenata koji su obuhvaćeni konceptom dispozitiva. Glavna je teza
ovoga članka da primjena dispozitiva u polju arhitekture pomaže boljem razumijevanju tog
koncepta – od Michela Foucaulta, preko Gillesa Deleuzea do Giorgia Agambena. U članku iznosim argumente u prilog tvrdnji da se nestabilan filozofski koncept dispositifa može
precizirati iskustvima arhitektonske prakse i teorije. Pokazat ću ne samo zašto je arhitektu
potrebna filozofija nego i obratno, zašto arhitekt i njegova praksa mogu pomoći filozofima., The answer to the question of whether there is a tension between the insight that the concept of dispositif reveals to us the variability of objective reality and the theory that the design of an architectural object depends on the various elements captured by the concept of dispositif The primary thesis of this paper is that the application of dispositifs in the field of architecture helps us to better understand this concept – from Michel Foucault to Gilles Deleuze to Giorgio Agamben. In other words, the paper presents arguments that the unstable philosophical concept of dispositif can be made more precise through the experiences of architectural practice and theory. On this occasion, I would like to show not only why architects need philosophy, but also, conversely, how an architect and his practice can help philosophers.",
publisher = "Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Filozofska Istrazivanja",
title = "Dispositif između filozofske kategorije i arhitektonskog koncepta, Dispositif between Philosophical Category and Architectural Concept",
volume = "42",
number = "4",
pages = "821-832",
doi = "10.21464/fi42410"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2022). Dispositif između filozofske kategorije i arhitektonskog koncepta. in Filozofska Istrazivanja
Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo., 42(4), 821-832.
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi42410

Vesnić S. Dispositif između filozofske kategorije i arhitektonskog koncepta. in Filozofska Istrazivanja. 2022;42(4):821-832.
doi:10.21464/fi42410 .

Vesnić, Snežana, "Dispositif između filozofske kategorije i arhitektonskog koncepta" in Filozofska Istrazivanja, 42, no. 4 (2022):821-832,
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi42410 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ristić, Marko
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1367
AB  - This paper aims at hypothesizing that the issue of technology could never be con sidered separate from the creative act. We develop the hypothesis starting from Heidegger’s 
opposition of technology and the poietic, which we interpret through the dialectic between the 
performative and constative function of the hand. To overcome the Heideggerian problem of 
Enframing, we introduce the question of singularity inherent in every poietic activity which, 
however, does not result in conceiving technology as an instrument. When defining the nature 
of such poietic singularization we employ Spinoza’s concept of an inadequate idea – an idea 
that involves its cause but does not explain it. The inherent negativity of the inadequate idea 
generates the sphere in which the new appears as radical otherness. But in order to produce the 
new, that is, to perform it, technology has to be conceptualized and thus made an instrument 
– a singular instrument of the creative act.
PB  - Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade
T2  - AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
T1  - The Conceptual Act of (Non)Instrumentality
IS  - 29
SP  - 1
EP  - 11
DO  - 10.25038/am.v0i29.536
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ristić, Marko and Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "This paper aims at hypothesizing that the issue of technology could never be con sidered separate from the creative act. We develop the hypothesis starting from Heidegger’s 
opposition of technology and the poietic, which we interpret through the dialectic between the 
performative and constative function of the hand. To overcome the Heideggerian problem of 
Enframing, we introduce the question of singularity inherent in every poietic activity which, 
however, does not result in conceiving technology as an instrument. When defining the nature 
of such poietic singularization we employ Spinoza’s concept of an inadequate idea – an idea 
that involves its cause but does not explain it. The inherent negativity of the inadequate idea 
generates the sphere in which the new appears as radical otherness. But in order to produce the 
new, that is, to perform it, technology has to be conceptualized and thus made an instrument 
– a singular instrument of the creative act.",
publisher = "Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade",
journal = "AM Journal of Art and Media Studies",
title = "The Conceptual Act of (Non)Instrumentality",
number = "29",
pages = "1-11",
doi = "10.25038/am.v0i29.536"
}

Ristić, M.,& Vesnić, S.. (2022). The Conceptual Act of (Non)Instrumentality. in AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade.(29), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i29.536

Ristić M, Vesnić S. The Conceptual Act of (Non)Instrumentality. in AM Journal of Art and Media Studies. 2022;(29):1-11.
doi:10.25038/am.v0i29.536 .

Ristić, Marko, Vesnić, Snežana, "The Conceptual Act of (Non)Instrumentality" in AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, no. 29 (2022):1-11,
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i29.536 . .

Vesnić, S., Milenković, V., Prodanović, D., Prica, F., Rajović, J.,& Savatijević, S.. (2021). Konkurs za dizajn za izradu urbanističko-arhitektonskog rešenja Trga oslobođenja u Zaječaru [otkup]. in Grad Zaječar - Gradska uprava grada Zaječara
Društvo arhitekata Niša..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2051

Vesnić S, Milenković V, Prodanović D, Prica F, Rajović J, Savatijević S. Konkurs za dizajn za izradu urbanističko-arhitektonskog rešenja Trga oslobođenja u Zaječaru [otkup]. in Grad Zaječar - Gradska uprava grada Zaječara. 2021;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2051 .

Vesnić, Snežana, Milenković, Vladimir, Prodanović, Duška, Prica, Filip, Rajović, Jelena, Savatijević, Siniša, "Konkurs za dizajn za izradu urbanističko-arhitektonskog rešenja Trga oslobođenja u Zaječaru [otkup]" in Grad Zaječar - Gradska uprava grada Zaječara (2021),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2051 .

Prica, F., Prodanović, D., Vesnić, S.,& Milenković, V.. (2021). Konkurs za izradu urbanističko-arhitektonskog rešenja centra novog dela grada sa idejnim rešenjem gradskog trga u Priboju [druga nagrada]. in Opština Priboj i Inženjerska komora Srbije
Opštinska uprava Priboj..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2050

Prica F, Prodanović D, Vesnić S, Milenković V. Konkurs za izradu urbanističko-arhitektonskog rešenja centra novog dela grada sa idejnim rešenjem gradskog trga u Priboju [druga nagrada]. in Opština Priboj i Inženjerska komora Srbije. 2021;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2050 .

Prica, Filip, Prodanović, Duška, Vesnić, Snežana, Milenković, Vladimir, "Konkurs za izradu urbanističko-arhitektonskog rešenja centra novog dela grada sa idejnim rešenjem gradskog trga u Priboju [druga nagrada]" in Opština Priboj i Inženjerska komora Srbije (2021),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_2050 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1198
AB  - This dual title refers to the very production of and with the architectural concept. The technology of translating the architectural object from one form of existence into another, in successive and simultaneous projections, comprises the hyper-specificity of the methodology of the architectural project. '(Sur)Realism of the Virtual' indicates a possibility for a different understanding of the terms "virtual" and "realism" in the sense of destabilizing the "reality of the virtual' and introducing the novel into the very notion of the virtual. René Magritte explicitly demonstrated that the object never matches its projection, just as words do not match the text they explain. (Sur)Realism of the virtual refers to my idea of creating a new conceptual potential at the point of absence, lack or inexistence of the architectural object. 

In thematizing actualization or realization of the empty concept, I follow the ideas of Thomas Aquinas that all substances seek their own perfection and everything is directed towards their final end: a fully realized state ofexistence or actuality. A virtual field represents the necessary conditions under which real experience is actualized, such that actualization and the object belong to the virtual. All these relations explain processes of production of the architectural object and show nearly mathematically the differences among the modalities of the object's reality across diverse status: potential, act, movement, and force.
PB  - Beograd : STRAND - Sustainable Urban Society Association
T2  - Learning architecture [Elektronski izvor] : proceedings / [Eight International Conference] On Architecture, [4-5 December 2020], Belgrade
T1  - The empty concept: (sur)realism of the virtual
SP  - 167
EP  - 173
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1198
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This dual title refers to the very production of and with the architectural concept. The technology of translating the architectural object from one form of existence into another, in successive and simultaneous projections, comprises the hyper-specificity of the methodology of the architectural project. '(Sur)Realism of the Virtual' indicates a possibility for a different understanding of the terms "virtual" and "realism" in the sense of destabilizing the "reality of the virtual' and introducing the novel into the very notion of the virtual. René Magritte explicitly demonstrated that the object never matches its projection, just as words do not match the text they explain. (Sur)Realism of the virtual refers to my idea of creating a new conceptual potential at the point of absence, lack or inexistence of the architectural object. 

In thematizing actualization or realization of the empty concept, I follow the ideas of Thomas Aquinas that all substances seek their own perfection and everything is directed towards their final end: a fully realized state ofexistence or actuality. A virtual field represents the necessary conditions under which real experience is actualized, such that actualization and the object belong to the virtual. All these relations explain processes of production of the architectural object and show nearly mathematically the differences among the modalities of the object's reality across diverse status: potential, act, movement, and force.",
publisher = "Beograd : STRAND - Sustainable Urban Society Association",
journal = "Learning architecture [Elektronski izvor] : proceedings / [Eight International Conference] On Architecture, [4-5 December 2020], Belgrade",
booktitle = "The empty concept: (sur)realism of the virtual",
pages = "167-173",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1198"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2020). The empty concept: (sur)realism of the virtual. in Learning architecture [Elektronski izvor] : proceedings / [Eight International Conference] On Architecture, [4-5 December 2020], Belgrade
Beograd : STRAND - Sustainable Urban Society Association., 167-173.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1198

Vesnić S. The empty concept: (sur)realism of the virtual. in Learning architecture [Elektronski izvor] : proceedings / [Eight International Conference] On Architecture, [4-5 December 2020], Belgrade. 2020;:167-173.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1198 .

Vesnić, Snežana, "The empty concept: (sur)realism of the virtual" in Learning architecture [Elektronski izvor] : proceedings / [Eight International Conference] On Architecture, [4-5 December 2020], Belgrade (2020):167-173,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1198 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1376
AB  - Uprkos i danas otvorenom filozofskom pitanju „Šta je kon cept?“, samo na prvi pogled paradoksalno, arhitektonska praksa 
postavlja još partikularnije pitanje: „Šta je arhitektonski koncept?“ 
Filozofske teorije, koncepcije i fragmentarni teorijski korpusi 
oslonci su ovog arhitektonskog razmatranja. U arhitektonskom 
tumačenju i upotrebi, ta polazišta istovremeno postaju tlo koje 
akcije ovog rada mogu da destabilizuju i arhitektonski oblikuju. 
Zbog toga je ovaj tekst moguće čitati počev od njegovog kraja, 
ili počev od uslovnih zaključaka, da bi se, naknadnim vraćanjem, 
potpuno razumele njegove inspiracije. Ta mogućnost dvostrukog 
čitanja pokazuje da objekt koji se ovde tematizuje nikada nije u 
sadašnjem vremenu, već da on, svojom budućom projekcijom, sâm 
prevazilazi svoje vreme.
PB  - Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga
PB  - Beograd : Institut za demokratski angažman jugoistočne Evrope
T1  - Arhitektonski koncept: objekt stvarnosti i subjekt iluzije
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1376
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Uprkos i danas otvorenom filozofskom pitanju „Šta je kon cept?“, samo na prvi pogled paradoksalno, arhitektonska praksa 
postavlja još partikularnije pitanje: „Šta je arhitektonski koncept?“ 
Filozofske teorije, koncepcije i fragmentarni teorijski korpusi 
oslonci su ovog arhitektonskog razmatranja. U arhitektonskom 
tumačenju i upotrebi, ta polazišta istovremeno postaju tlo koje 
akcije ovog rada mogu da destabilizuju i arhitektonski oblikuju. 
Zbog toga je ovaj tekst moguće čitati počev od njegovog kraja, 
ili počev od uslovnih zaključaka, da bi se, naknadnim vraćanjem, 
potpuno razumele njegove inspiracije. Ta mogućnost dvostrukog 
čitanja pokazuje da objekt koji se ovde tematizuje nikada nije u 
sadašnjem vremenu, već da on, svojom budućom projekcijom, sâm 
prevazilazi svoje vreme.",
publisher = "Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga, Beograd : Institut za demokratski angažman jugoistočne Evrope",
title = "Arhitektonski koncept: objekt stvarnosti i subjekt iluzije",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1376"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2020). Arhitektonski koncept: objekt stvarnosti i subjekt iluzije. 
Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1376

Vesnić S. Arhitektonski koncept: objekt stvarnosti i subjekt iluzije. 2020;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1376 .

Vesnić, Snežana, "Arhitektonski koncept: objekt stvarnosti i subjekt iluzije" (2020),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1376 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Cvejić, Igor
AU  - Ćipranić, Miloš
AU  - Lošonc, Mark
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1365
AB  - Arhitektura je umetnost koja aficira najveći broj članova jedne zajednice. Stanovnici gradova ne mogu pobeći od nje ili barem to mogu učiniti privremeno. Neko bi mogao da kaže da život jednog grada, ljudi koji žive u njemu, može da se zamisli bez poezije, slikarstva ili filma, može da teče ili se održava bez njih, ali bez građevina, javnih ili privatnih - socijalnog gesta arhitekte ili arhitekture - to je nemoguće. Sve one skupa, u totalitetu, sublimiraju, određuju i štite egzistenciju jedne društvene zajednice.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet
T2  - Živeti zajedno
T1  - Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice
SP  - 375
EP  - 381
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1365
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Cvejić, Igor and Ćipranić, Miloš and Lošonc, Mark and Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Arhitektura je umetnost koja aficira najveći broj članova jedne zajednice. Stanovnici gradova ne mogu pobeći od nje ili barem to mogu učiniti privremeno. Neko bi mogao da kaže da život jednog grada, ljudi koji žive u njemu, može da se zamisli bez poezije, slikarstva ili filma, može da teče ili se održava bez njih, ali bez građevina, javnih ili privatnih - socijalnog gesta arhitekte ili arhitekture - to je nemoguće. Sve one skupa, u totalitetu, sublimiraju, određuju i štite egzistenciju jedne društvene zajednice.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet",
journal = "Živeti zajedno",
booktitle = "Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice",
pages = "375-381",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1365"
}

Bojanić, P., Cvejić, I., Ćipranić, M., Lošonc, M.,& Vesnić, S.. (2019). Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice. in Živeti zajedno
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet., 375-381.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1365

Bojanić P, Cvejić I, Ćipranić M, Lošonc M, Vesnić S. Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice. in Živeti zajedno. 2019;:375-381.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1365 .

Bojanić, Petar, Cvejić, Igor, Ćipranić, Miloš, Lošonc, Mark, Vesnić, Snežana, "Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice" in Živeti zajedno (2019):375-381,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1365 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
AU  - Ćipranić, Miloš
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1366
AB  - The concept features as a vital element in architectural protocol and its vocabulary. If
architecture and philosophy are defined as creation of concepts, then they are the terra
nullius shared by both disciplines. By distinguishing the architectural concept from its
philosophical counterpart, this paper analyzes the former as an entity that animates
and directs a project as the documental prefiguration of an architectural object. In a
more radical move, we consider architecture itself as a concept, that is, what makes
architecture what it is and what this discipline can become tomorrow. In addition to
decisively participating in the process of generating an object yet to be constructed (the
fetus of a building), on a correlative level, the concept has an essential role in theoretical
self-thematization of architecture and guards the future of the architectural profession
as an autonomous intellectual discipline.
PB  - Rosenberg & Sellier
T2  - Rivista di estetica
T1  - The concept: a map for generations
IS  - 71
SP  - 101
EP  - 116
DO  - 10.4000/estetica.5529
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana and Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The concept features as a vital element in architectural protocol and its vocabulary. If
architecture and philosophy are defined as creation of concepts, then they are the terra
nullius shared by both disciplines. By distinguishing the architectural concept from its
philosophical counterpart, this paper analyzes the former as an entity that animates
and directs a project as the documental prefiguration of an architectural object. In a
more radical move, we consider architecture itself as a concept, that is, what makes
architecture what it is and what this discipline can become tomorrow. In addition to
decisively participating in the process of generating an object yet to be constructed (the
fetus of a building), on a correlative level, the concept has an essential role in theoretical
self-thematization of architecture and guards the future of the architectural profession
as an autonomous intellectual discipline.",
publisher = "Rosenberg & Sellier",
journal = "Rivista di estetica",
title = "The concept: a map for generations",
number = "71",
pages = "101-116",
doi = "10.4000/estetica.5529"
}

Vesnić, S.,& Ćipranić, M.. (2019). The concept: a map for generations. in Rivista di estetica
Rosenberg & Sellier.(71), 101-116.
https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.5529

Vesnić S, Ćipranić M. The concept: a map for generations. in Rivista di estetica. 2019;(71):101-116.
doi:10.4000/estetica.5529 .

Vesnić, Snežana, Ćipranić, Miloš, "The concept: a map for generations" in Rivista di estetica, no. 71 (2019):101-116,
https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.5529 . .

TY  - THES
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana D.
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=6009
UR  - https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:18277/bdef:Content/download
UR  - http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=50434063
UR  - http://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/123456789/9899
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/389
AB  - Even though the question "what is a concept" is still current, this work poses a more particular question "what is an architectural concept"...
AB  - Упркос и данас отвореном филозофском питању "Шта је концепт?" овај рад поставња још партикуларније питање:"Шта је архитектонски концепт?"...
PB  - Универзитет у Београду, Архитектонски факултет
T2  - Универзитет у Београду
T1  - Philosophy and aestethics of the architectural concept: object of reality and object of illusion
T1  - Филозофија и естетика архитектонског концепта: објект стварности и објект илузије
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_9899
ER  - 

@phdthesis{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana D.",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Even though the question "what is a concept" is still current, this work poses a more particular question "what is an architectural concept"..., Упркос и данас отвореном филозофском питању "Шта је концепт?" овај рад поставња још партикуларније питање:"Шта је архитектонски концепт?"...",
publisher = "Универзитет у Београду, Архитектонски факултет",
journal = "Универзитет у Београду",
title = "Philosophy and aestethics of the architectural concept: object of reality and object of illusion, Филозофија и естетика архитектонског концепта: објект стварности и објект илузије",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_9899"
}

Vesnić, S. D.. (2018). Philosophy and aestethics of the architectural concept: object of reality and object of illusion. in Универзитет у Београду
Универзитет у Београду, Архитектонски факултет..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_9899

Vesnić SD. Philosophy and aestethics of the architectural concept: object of reality and object of illusion. in Универзитет у Београду. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_9899 .

Vesnić, Snežana D., "Philosophy and aestethics of the architectural concept: object of reality and object of illusion" in Универзитет у Београду (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_9899 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/393
AB  - Two great theories – one in philosophy, one in architecture – emerge nearly simultaneously in the twentieth century: Gilles Deleuze’s understanding of the “concept,” that is, defining philosophy as an activity that produces concepts, and Peter Eisenman’s idea of the “project” as a platform, “position,” or “theory” of an architect. My intention is to suggest and problematize the idea of the concept as “capacity” or “potentiality” implying the production of a multitude of “concepts” or varying “conceptions.” Deleuze’s great significance for architecture of this century allowed for the construction of the “concept” as “author’s potential,” the source of activity and creative architectural acts. An architectural concept, determined in the course of the text, and thanks to which architectural terminology is redefined, could potentially be quite useful in philosophy and theory of the subject.
AB  - Dve velike teorije – jedna u filozofiji, jedna u arhitekturi – pojavljuju se skoro simultano u dvadesetom veku: Žil Delezovo razumevanje „koncepta“, odnosno, definisanje filozofije kao aktivnosti koja „proizvodi“ koncepte, i Piter Аjzenmanova ideja „projekta“ kao platforme, „stanovišta“, ili „teorije“ (jednog) arhitekte. Moja namera je da predložim i problematizujem ideju koncepta kao „kapaciteta“ ili „potencijalnosti“, implicirajući proizvodnju mnoštva „koncepata“ ili „koncepcija“. Delezov veliki značaj za arhitekturu ovog veka omogućio je konstrukciju „koncepta“ kao „autorskog potencijalа“, izvora aktivnosti i stvaralačkih arhitektonskih akata. Arhitektonski  koncept, koji se odredjuje u ovom tekstu, i zahvaljujući kome se redefiniše arhitektonska terminologija, potencijalno može da bude veoma koristan u filozofiji i teoriji subjekta.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - What Is an Architectural Concept? The “Concept” of Deleuze and “Project” of Eisenman
T1  - Šta je  arhitektonski  koncept? „Koncept“ kod Deleza i „projekt“ kod Аjzenmana
VL  - 28
IS  - 4
SP  - 1122
EP  - 1135
DO  - 10.2298/FID1704122V
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Two great theories – one in philosophy, one in architecture – emerge nearly simultaneously in the twentieth century: Gilles Deleuze’s understanding of the “concept,” that is, defining philosophy as an activity that produces concepts, and Peter Eisenman’s idea of the “project” as a platform, “position,” or “theory” of an architect. My intention is to suggest and problematize the idea of the concept as “capacity” or “potentiality” implying the production of a multitude of “concepts” or varying “conceptions.” Deleuze’s great significance for architecture of this century allowed for the construction of the “concept” as “author’s potential,” the source of activity and creative architectural acts. An architectural concept, determined in the course of the text, and thanks to which architectural terminology is redefined, could potentially be quite useful in philosophy and theory of the subject., Dve velike teorije – jedna u filozofiji, jedna u arhitekturi – pojavljuju se skoro simultano u dvadesetom veku: Žil Delezovo razumevanje „koncepta“, odnosno, definisanje filozofije kao aktivnosti koja „proizvodi“ koncepte, i Piter Аjzenmanova ideja „projekta“ kao platforme, „stanovišta“, ili „teorije“ (jednog) arhitekte. Moja namera je da predložim i problematizujem ideju koncepta kao „kapaciteta“ ili „potencijalnosti“, implicirajući proizvodnju mnoštva „koncepata“ ili „koncepcija“. Delezov veliki značaj za arhitekturu ovog veka omogućio je konstrukciju „koncepta“ kao „autorskog potencijalа“, izvora aktivnosti i stvaralačkih arhitektonskih akata. Arhitektonski  koncept, koji se odredjuje u ovom tekstu, i zahvaljujući kome se redefiniše arhitektonska terminologija, potencijalno može da bude veoma koristan u filozofiji i teoriji subjekta.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "What Is an Architectural Concept? The “Concept” of Deleuze and “Project” of Eisenman, Šta je  arhitektonski  koncept? „Koncept“ kod Deleza i „projekt“ kod Аjzenmana",
volume = "28",
number = "4",
pages = "1122-1135",
doi = "10.2298/FID1704122V"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2017). What Is an Architectural Concept? The “Concept” of Deleuze and “Project” of Eisenman. in Filozofija i društvo
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 28(4), 1122-1135.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1704122V

Vesnić S. What Is an Architectural Concept? The “Concept” of Deleuze and “Project” of Eisenman. in Filozofija i društvo. 2017;28(4):1122-1135.
doi:10.2298/FID1704122V .

Vesnić, Snežana, "What Is an Architectural Concept? The “Concept” of Deleuze and “Project” of Eisenman" in Filozofija i društvo, 28, no. 4 (2017):1122-1135,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1704122V . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/431
AB  - Theoretical interpretations and attempts at instrumentalisation
of the ties and exchanges between philosophy and architecture
have mostly been directed at questions of language or the
institutionalisation of the discipline of architecture. In this text,
I suggest a different approach to philosophical engagement
in architecture: a simultaneous use in the methodology of
the architectural project and constitution of a philosophy of
architecture, not only as a question of interdisciplinary exchange,
but as an integral part of comprehensive architectural processes,
with philosophy still maintaining its original authenticity. My
approach is twofold: explain the methodology and delineate
its framework, but also raise the question what is an architect’s
philosophical platform. To that end, I will attempt to elaborate
three models: 1) the first delves partially into the fields of fiction
and illusion, and in it the architect adopts the role (position) of the
philosopher, 2) the second model is the architectural engagement
of philosophical notions, and 3) the third is the use of philosophical
concepts in the creation of architectural ones. Corresponding to
each, I will suggest the activity of “repetition of difference” as a
possibility of creation of the authentic architectural concept.
PB  - Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Architecture
T2  - SAJ : Serbian architectural journal
T1  - The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings?
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
SP  - 201
EP  - 216
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_431
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Theoretical interpretations and attempts at instrumentalisation
of the ties and exchanges between philosophy and architecture
have mostly been directed at questions of language or the
institutionalisation of the discipline of architecture. In this text,
I suggest a different approach to philosophical engagement
in architecture: a simultaneous use in the methodology of
the architectural project and constitution of a philosophy of
architecture, not only as a question of interdisciplinary exchange,
but as an integral part of comprehensive architectural processes,
with philosophy still maintaining its original authenticity. My
approach is twofold: explain the methodology and delineate
its framework, but also raise the question what is an architect’s
philosophical platform. To that end, I will attempt to elaborate
three models: 1) the first delves partially into the fields of fiction
and illusion, and in it the architect adopts the role (position) of the
philosopher, 2) the second model is the architectural engagement
of philosophical notions, and 3) the third is the use of philosophical
concepts in the creation of architectural ones. Corresponding to
each, I will suggest the activity of “repetition of difference” as a
possibility of creation of the authentic architectural concept.",
publisher = "Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Architecture",
journal = "SAJ : Serbian architectural journal",
title = "The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings?",
volume = "9",
number = "3",
pages = "201-216",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_431"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2017). The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings?. in SAJ : Serbian architectural journal
Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Architecture., 9(3), 201-216.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_431

Vesnić S. The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings?. in SAJ : Serbian architectural journal. 2017;9(3):201-216.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_431 .

Vesnić, Snežana, "The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings?" in SAJ : Serbian architectural journal, 9, no. 3 (2017):201-216,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_431 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Milenković, Vladimir
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
AU  - Stratimirović, Tatjana
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/682
AB  - There are 800 towers in Belgrade, mostly built in the 20th century, at the time of
Modernism. In relation to the prominent tradition of their construction, the current
situation can be defined as a paradox of continuity – which can be expressed through
two contradictions. The first contradiction is related to the comparison of the number
of high-rise structures completed during the industrial development and the fact that
after 1990 the number of realized structures of eight storeys or higher is insignificant.
The second contradiction is related to the ratio of the height of the tallest existing
structures and the maximum height allowed for the new structures, as defined by the
current normative acts. In this context Belgrade has a tradition of high-rise
construction, yet at present there is no awareness, and no professional or social
consensus on the need for the high-rise developments. The restraints of height and
land zoning for high-rise development are not only constraining factors in strategic
planning and expansion of the city, but they create an economic problem by opposing
the very concept of prosperity. Additionally, in terms of the cultural context, they limit
the possibilities for fulfilment of Belgrade’s contemporary demands and its iconic
future. The high-rise structures can be translated into a tool used to emphasize the
clear intentions of progress. The city turns into a metaphor for economic and cultural
status - between the visual symbol and the symbol of power. Most of all, from the
architectural point of view, it becomes the physical parameter of inventiveness,
knowledge, capacity, technical and overall achievements of a community. The
mythological capacity of such a situation can be simply translated into a necessity for
Belgrade to construct at least one extremely tall structure – a tower of no less than
150m high.
PB  - Belgrade : Faculty of Architecture
C3  - Places and Technologies 2014 [Elektronski izvor] : keeping up with technologies to improve places : conference proceedings : 1st international academic conference, Belgrade, 3-4. April 2014
T1  - Belgrade skyline: continuity, paradoxes & desires
SP  - 416
EP  - 423
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_682
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Milenković, Vladimir and Vesnić, Snežana and Stratimirović, Tatjana",
year = "2014",
abstract = "There are 800 towers in Belgrade, mostly built in the 20th century, at the time of
Modernism. In relation to the prominent tradition of their construction, the current
situation can be defined as a paradox of continuity – which can be expressed through
two contradictions. The first contradiction is related to the comparison of the number
of high-rise structures completed during the industrial development and the fact that
after 1990 the number of realized structures of eight storeys or higher is insignificant.
The second contradiction is related to the ratio of the height of the tallest existing
structures and the maximum height allowed for the new structures, as defined by the
current normative acts. In this context Belgrade has a tradition of high-rise
construction, yet at present there is no awareness, and no professional or social
consensus on the need for the high-rise developments. The restraints of height and
land zoning for high-rise development are not only constraining factors in strategic
planning and expansion of the city, but they create an economic problem by opposing
the very concept of prosperity. Additionally, in terms of the cultural context, they limit
the possibilities for fulfilment of Belgrade’s contemporary demands and its iconic
future. The high-rise structures can be translated into a tool used to emphasize the
clear intentions of progress. The city turns into a metaphor for economic and cultural
status - between the visual symbol and the symbol of power. Most of all, from the
architectural point of view, it becomes the physical parameter of inventiveness,
knowledge, capacity, technical and overall achievements of a community. The
mythological capacity of such a situation can be simply translated into a necessity for
Belgrade to construct at least one extremely tall structure – a tower of no less than
150m high.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Faculty of Architecture",
journal = "Places and Technologies 2014 [Elektronski izvor] : keeping up with technologies to improve places : conference proceedings : 1st international academic conference, Belgrade, 3-4. April 2014",
title = "Belgrade skyline: continuity, paradoxes & desires",
pages = "416-423",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_682"
}

Milenković, V., Vesnić, S.,& Stratimirović, T.. (2014). Belgrade skyline: continuity, paradoxes & desires. in Places and Technologies 2014 [Elektronski izvor] : keeping up with technologies to improve places : conference proceedings : 1st international academic conference, Belgrade, 3-4. April 2014
Belgrade : Faculty of Architecture., 416-423.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_682

Milenković V, Vesnić S, Stratimirović T. Belgrade skyline: continuity, paradoxes & desires. in Places and Technologies 2014 [Elektronski izvor] : keeping up with technologies to improve places : conference proceedings : 1st international academic conference, Belgrade, 3-4. April 2014. 2014;:416-423.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_682 .

Milenković, Vladimir, Vesnić, Snežana, Stratimirović, Tatjana, "Belgrade skyline: continuity, paradoxes & desires" in Places and Technologies 2014 [Elektronski izvor] : keeping up with technologies to improve places : conference proceedings : 1st international academic conference, Belgrade, 3-4. April 2014 (2014):416-423,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_682 .