TY  - JOUR
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
AU  - Milić, Đorđe
AU  - Petrić, Jasna
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1654
AB  - In 2019, Serbia adopted its first national urban policy. This document was established through a communicative process during 2018–2019, formally encouraging urban governance as a practical innovation in Serbia’s planning doctrine. The main aim of this research is to explore institutional capacity development within a live setting of the policy formation process. The participants of this process are the primary subjects of the research. Data was collected through participatory events in four instances during the process. The concept of institutional capacity development is used in this paper as a basic framework to assess knowledge, relational and mobilisation capacity for urban governance. The main contribution of this paper is providing an understanding of the challenges and potentials for establishing urban governance practices in a post-socialist country planning context. Findings indicate an increase in the participants’ knowledge and understanding of governance instruments such that coordination and cooperation are continually unfolding. The identified challenges relate to the mobilisation capacity and fragility of institutions and resistance to change, while a need to deal with complexity and uncertainty remains present.
PB  - SAGE Publications
T2  - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
T1  - Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views
VL  - 40
IS  - 1
SP  - 69
EP  - 89
DO  - 10.1177/23996544211002188
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Čolić, Ratka and Milić, Đorđe and Petrić, Jasna and Čolić, Nataša",
year = "2021",
abstract = "In 2019, Serbia adopted its first national urban policy. This document was established through a communicative process during 2018–2019, formally encouraging urban governance as a practical innovation in Serbia’s planning doctrine. The main aim of this research is to explore institutional capacity development within a live setting of the policy formation process. The participants of this process are the primary subjects of the research. Data was collected through participatory events in four instances during the process. The concept of institutional capacity development is used in this paper as a basic framework to assess knowledge, relational and mobilisation capacity for urban governance. The main contribution of this paper is providing an understanding of the challenges and potentials for establishing urban governance practices in a post-socialist country planning context. Findings indicate an increase in the participants’ knowledge and understanding of governance instruments such that coordination and cooperation are continually unfolding. The identified challenges relate to the mobilisation capacity and fragility of institutions and resistance to change, while a need to deal with complexity and uncertainty remains present.",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space",
title = "Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views",
volume = "40",
number = "1",
pages = "69-89",
doi = "10.1177/23996544211002188"
}

Čolić, R., Milić, Đ., Petrić, J.,& Čolić, N.. (2021). Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views. in Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
SAGE Publications., 40(1), 69-89.
https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211002188

Čolić R, Milić Đ, Petrić J, Čolić N. Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views. in Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. 2021;40(1):69-89.
doi:10.1177/23996544211002188 .

Čolić, Ratka, Milić, Đorđe, Petrić, Jasna, Čolić, Nataša, "Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views" in Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 40, no. 1 (2021):69-89,
https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211002188 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
AU  - Dželebdžić, Omiljena
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1719
AB  - The aim of this research is to examine the new directions of democratic practices in urban
governance, including public participation and multi-stakeholder involvement in Serbia.
Through the reflections of Serbian planning practitioners and planners, the paper frames their
historical reality of transitional, post-socialist local context as ‘somewhere in-between’ a
complex system of dynamics. Therefore, the requirements of market economy, EU policies,
new planning ideas and influences together with the formal participatory procedures and
professional idea of the previous, socialist practice come together to this contemporary
historical reality. The paper explores, through ethnographic research with professional
planners (from 2007 to 2020), the application of participatory methods with the support of
international programs that operated in the field of urban governance in Serbia. The research
framework combines critical pragmatism and collaborative planning to shed light on daily
planning practice characterized by an ongoing transition through dynamics that has shifted
to governance, pluralism, and markets. These dynamics have been even more evident when
the urban planning challenge during COVID-19 pandemic, have provided practitioners’
insights into ‘what can, and should we do now?’. The paper defines planning actions take
form of small, pragmatic steps and alternative practices that hope to contribute to effective
urban governance on specific urban challenges.
PB  - Aalborg : Aalborg University
C3  - Transforming Urban Governance in a Post-Pandemic World: The "New Normal" in Planning and Participation : book of abstracts, 20-21-22 October
T1  - Rethinking participatory practices of professional planners as a response to urban governance in Serbia
SP  - 2
EP  - 2
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1719
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Čolić, Nataša and Dželebdžić, Omiljena and Čolić, Ratka",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The aim of this research is to examine the new directions of democratic practices in urban
governance, including public participation and multi-stakeholder involvement in Serbia.
Through the reflections of Serbian planning practitioners and planners, the paper frames their
historical reality of transitional, post-socialist local context as ‘somewhere in-between’ a
complex system of dynamics. Therefore, the requirements of market economy, EU policies,
new planning ideas and influences together with the formal participatory procedures and
professional idea of the previous, socialist practice come together to this contemporary
historical reality. The paper explores, through ethnographic research with professional
planners (from 2007 to 2020), the application of participatory methods with the support of
international programs that operated in the field of urban governance in Serbia. The research
framework combines critical pragmatism and collaborative planning to shed light on daily
planning practice characterized by an ongoing transition through dynamics that has shifted
to governance, pluralism, and markets. These dynamics have been even more evident when
the urban planning challenge during COVID-19 pandemic, have provided practitioners’
insights into ‘what can, and should we do now?’. The paper defines planning actions take
form of small, pragmatic steps and alternative practices that hope to contribute to effective
urban governance on specific urban challenges.",
publisher = "Aalborg : Aalborg University",
journal = "Transforming Urban Governance in a Post-Pandemic World: The "New Normal" in Planning and Participation : book of abstracts, 20-21-22 October",
title = "Rethinking participatory practices of professional planners as a response to urban governance in Serbia",
pages = "2-2",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1719"
}

Čolić, N., Dželebdžić, O.,& Čolić, R.. (2021). Rethinking participatory practices of professional planners as a response to urban governance in Serbia. in Transforming Urban Governance in a Post-Pandemic World: The "New Normal" in Planning and Participation : book of abstracts, 20-21-22 October
Aalborg : Aalborg University., 2-2.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1719

Čolić N, Dželebdžić O, Čolić R. Rethinking participatory practices of professional planners as a response to urban governance in Serbia. in Transforming Urban Governance in a Post-Pandemic World: The "New Normal" in Planning and Participation : book of abstracts, 20-21-22 October. 2021;:2-2.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1719 .

Čolić, Nataša, Dželebdžić, Omiljena, Čolić, Ratka, "Rethinking participatory practices of professional planners as a response to urban governance in Serbia" in Transforming Urban Governance in a Post-Pandemic World: The "New Normal" in Planning and Participation : book of abstracts, 20-21-22 October (2021):2-2,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1719 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
AU  - Dželebdžić, Omiljena
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1720
AB  - This article considers a decade of practice and research in the field of
participatory planning in the context of a post-socialist country,
Serbia. The main aim is to assess the transformative potential of
participation within the following domains: 1) formation of
relationships, 2) recognition of issues and priorities, 3) perception of
values and results of planning process, and 4) possibility for
institutionalization of participatory practice in a post-socialist country
planning context. The presented work examines urban development
practices in 45 Serbian cities through the lenses of 95 professional
planners that were interviewed over the course of 13 years. What is
common to all of the examined cases is that participatory planning
processes were realized through the support of international programs that operated in the field of territorial governance in Serbia
from 2007 to 2020. Findings indicate that the acceptance of new
concepts and policies in the local path-contingent practice requires
pragmatic attitude of planning professionals, small steps and liberty
to experiment, but also a possibility to discuss new discourses and
understand their results. In the theoretical frame, this article
contributes to the critical analysis of pragmatism and the flow of
transnational policy discourse.
PB  - Polytechnic Gdansk
C3  - Adapting Planning: Rethinking Planning Practices : book of abstracts, AESOP 2021 online conference 12-14/07/2021
T1  - Transformative potential of participatory planning in a post-socialist context of Serbia
SP  - 159
EP  - 160
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1720
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Čolić, Ratka and Čolić, Nataša and Dželebdžić, Omiljena",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This article considers a decade of practice and research in the field of
participatory planning in the context of a post-socialist country,
Serbia. The main aim is to assess the transformative potential of
participation within the following domains: 1) formation of
relationships, 2) recognition of issues and priorities, 3) perception of
values and results of planning process, and 4) possibility for
institutionalization of participatory practice in a post-socialist country
planning context. The presented work examines urban development
practices in 45 Serbian cities through the lenses of 95 professional
planners that were interviewed over the course of 13 years. What is
common to all of the examined cases is that participatory planning
processes were realized through the support of international programs that operated in the field of territorial governance in Serbia
from 2007 to 2020. Findings indicate that the acceptance of new
concepts and policies in the local path-contingent practice requires
pragmatic attitude of planning professionals, small steps and liberty
to experiment, but also a possibility to discuss new discourses and
understand their results. In the theoretical frame, this article
contributes to the critical analysis of pragmatism and the flow of
transnational policy discourse.",
publisher = "Polytechnic Gdansk",
journal = "Adapting Planning: Rethinking Planning Practices : book of abstracts, AESOP 2021 online conference 12-14/07/2021",
title = "Transformative potential of participatory planning in a post-socialist context of Serbia",
pages = "159-160",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1720"
}

Čolić, R., Čolić, N.,& Dželebdžić, O.. (2021). Transformative potential of participatory planning in a post-socialist context of Serbia. in Adapting Planning: Rethinking Planning Practices : book of abstracts, AESOP 2021 online conference 12-14/07/2021
Polytechnic Gdansk., 159-160.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1720

Čolić R, Čolić N, Dželebdžić O. Transformative potential of participatory planning in a post-socialist context of Serbia. in Adapting Planning: Rethinking Planning Practices : book of abstracts, AESOP 2021 online conference 12-14/07/2021. 2021;:159-160.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1720 .

Čolić, Ratka, Čolić, Nataša, Dželebdžić, Omiljena, "Transformative potential of participatory planning in a post-socialist context of Serbia" in Adapting Planning: Rethinking Planning Practices : book of abstracts, AESOP 2021 online conference 12-14/07/2021 (2021):159-160,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1720 .

Milić, Đ., Trkulja, S., Radosavljević, Z., Čolić, R., Maksin, M., Zeković, S., Nenković-Riznić, M., Manić, B., Dželebdžić, O., Đukić, A., Jokanović, I., Petrić, J., Niković, A., Danilović-Hristić, N., Bajić, T., Čolić, N.,& Brankov, B.. (2020). Novi metodološki pristup integrisanom upravljanju održivim urbanim razvojem u Republici Srbiji (na primeru Strategije održivog i integralnog urbanog razvoja Republike Srbije do 2030.godine). in Matični naučni odbor za saobraćaj, urbanizam i građevinarstvo.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1687

Milić Đ, Trkulja S, Radosavljević Z, Čolić R, Maksin M, Zeković S, Nenković-Riznić M, Manić B, Dželebdžić O, Đukić A, Jokanović I, Petrić J, Niković A, Danilović-Hristić N, Bajić T, Čolić N, Brankov B. Novi metodološki pristup integrisanom upravljanju održivim urbanim razvojem u Republici Srbiji (na primeru Strategije održivog i integralnog urbanog razvoja Republike Srbije do 2030.godine). in Matični naučni odbor za saobraćaj, urbanizam i građevinarstvo. 2020;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1687 .

Milić, Đorđe, Trkulja, Siniša, Radosavljević, Zoran, Čolić, Ratka, Maksin, Marija, Zeković, Slavka, Nenković-Riznić, Marina, Manić, Božidar, Dželebdžić, Omiljena, Đukić, Aleksandar, Jokanović, Igor, Petrić, Jasna, Niković, Ana, Danilović-Hristić, Nataša, Bajić, Tanja, Čolić, Nataša, Brankov, Borjan, "Novi metodološki pristup integrisanom upravljanju održivim urbanim razvojem u Republici Srbiji (na primeru Strategije održivog i integralnog urbanog razvoja Republike Srbije do 2030.godine)" in Matični naučni odbor za saobraćaj, urbanizam i građevinarstvo (2020),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1687 .

Milić, Đ., Trkulja, S., Radosavljević, Z., Maksin, M., Zeković, S., Nenković-Riznić, M., Manić, B., Dželebdžić, O., Đukić, A., Jokanović, I., Petrić, J., Niković, A., Danilović-Hristić, N., Bajić, T., Čolić, N., Brankov, B., Miler, H., Čolić, R., Babić, D.,& Gauli, J.. (2019). Стратегија одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године [награда 28. Међународни салон урбанизма]. in 28. Међународни салон урбанизма Ниш, 8 - 1 3 . новембар 201 9 = 28th International urban planners' exhibition niš 8 - 1 3 november
Udruženje urbanista Srbije., 01.01-01.01.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1705

Milić Đ, Trkulja S, Radosavljević Z, Maksin M, Zeković S, Nenković-Riznić M, Manić B, Dželebdžić O, Đukić A, Jokanović I, Petrić J, Niković A, Danilović-Hristić N, Bajić T, Čolić N, Brankov B, Miler H, Čolić R, Babić D, Gauli J. Стратегија одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године [награда 28. Међународни салон урбанизма]. in 28. Међународни салон урбанизма Ниш, 8 - 1 3 . новембар 201 9 = 28th International urban planners' exhibition niš 8 - 1 3 november. 2019;:01.01-01.01.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1705 .

Milić, Đorđe, Trkulja, Siniša, Radosavljević, Zoran, Maksin, Marija, Zeković, Slavka, Nenković-Riznić, Marina, Manić, Božidar, Dželebdžić, Omiljena, Đukić, Aleksandar, Jokanović, Igor, Petrić, Jasna, Niković, Ana, Danilović-Hristić, Nataša, Bajić, Tanja, Čolić, Nataša, Brankov, Borjan, Miler, Harald, Čolić, Ratka, Babić, Drago, Gauli, Johan, "Стратегија одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године [награда 28. Међународни салон урбанизма]" in 28. Међународни салон урбанизма Ниш, 8 - 1 3 . новембар 201 9 = 28th International urban planners' exhibition niš 8 - 1 3 november (2019):01.01-01.01,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_1705 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/305
AB  - Open public spaceis usually seen as physical, but also dialogic space that promotes social responsibility and affects the quality of life of citizens. Public participation in planning and design of such spaces has been observed as a fundamental emanation of democracy. This paper considers the effects of applying participatory approach to the urban design of open public spaces as a practical experiment in teaching. Different levels and methods of participation were used in order to identify main problems and potentials for the use of public space, formulate goals and priorities, and re-evaluate the concepts of urban design. Acquiring knowledge is considered to be the most important result of a dynamic approach, directed towards learning and achieving new skills. Thus, this paper suggests that the capacity development through participation may be seen as a basis for the future community development, and longitudinal care fort he public space as common good.
AB  - Otvoreni javni prostori se uglavnom posmatraju kao fizički, ali i kao dijaloški, prostori koji podstiču društvenu odgovornost i utiču na kvalitet života u datom lokalnom kontekstu. Učešće javnosti u planiranju i dizajnu takvih prostora se već duži niz godina posmatra kao osnovna emanacija demokratije. Ovaj rad razmatra efekte primene participativnog pristupa urbanom dizajnu otvorenih javnih prostora kao praktičnog eksperimenta u nastavi. U procesu urbanog dizajna su korišćeni različiti nivoi i metode participacije kako bi se prepoznali glavni problemi i potencijali u korišćenju javnih prostora, formulisali ciljevi i prioritetne aktivnosti za njihovo uređenje, kao i reevaluirali početni koncepti. U ovom radu se saznanje sagledava kao najznačajni rezultat dinamičkog pristupa, usmeravanja na razvoj novih znanja i sposobnosti. S tim u vezi, sugeriše se da se razvijanje kapaciteta kroz participaciju može posmatrati i kao osnova za budući razvoj zajednice i brigu o javnom prostoru kao zajedničkom dobru.
PB  - Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Arhitektura i urbanizam
T1  - Dialogic and public space: Participatory approach to urban design
T1  - Dijaloški i javni prostor - participativni pristup urbanom dizajnu
IS  - 47
SP  - 37
EP  - 45
DO  - 10.5937/a-u0-17445
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Čolić, Nataša and Čolić, Ratka",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Open public spaceis usually seen as physical, but also dialogic space that promotes social responsibility and affects the quality of life of citizens. Public participation in planning and design of such spaces has been observed as a fundamental emanation of democracy. This paper considers the effects of applying participatory approach to the urban design of open public spaces as a practical experiment in teaching. Different levels and methods of participation were used in order to identify main problems and potentials for the use of public space, formulate goals and priorities, and re-evaluate the concepts of urban design. Acquiring knowledge is considered to be the most important result of a dynamic approach, directed towards learning and achieving new skills. Thus, this paper suggests that the capacity development through participation may be seen as a basis for the future community development, and longitudinal care fort he public space as common good., Otvoreni javni prostori se uglavnom posmatraju kao fizički, ali i kao dijaloški, prostori koji podstiču društvenu odgovornost i utiču na kvalitet života u datom lokalnom kontekstu. Učešće javnosti u planiranju i dizajnu takvih prostora se već duži niz godina posmatra kao osnovna emanacija demokratije. Ovaj rad razmatra efekte primene participativnog pristupa urbanom dizajnu otvorenih javnih prostora kao praktičnog eksperimenta u nastavi. U procesu urbanog dizajna su korišćeni različiti nivoi i metode participacije kako bi se prepoznali glavni problemi i potencijali u korišćenju javnih prostora, formulisali ciljevi i prioritetne aktivnosti za njihovo uređenje, kao i reevaluirali početni koncepti. U ovom radu se saznanje sagledava kao najznačajni rezultat dinamičkog pristupa, usmeravanja na razvoj novih znanja i sposobnosti. S tim u vezi, sugeriše se da se razvijanje kapaciteta kroz participaciju može posmatrati i kao osnova za budući razvoj zajednice i brigu o javnom prostoru kao zajedničkom dobru.",
publisher = "Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Arhitektura i urbanizam",
title = "Dialogic and public space: Participatory approach to urban design, Dijaloški i javni prostor - participativni pristup urbanom dizajnu",
number = "47",
pages = "37-45",
doi = "10.5937/a-u0-17445"
}

Čolić, N.,& Čolić, R.. (2018). Dialogic and public space: Participatory approach to urban design. in Arhitektura i urbanizam
Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije, Beograd.(47), 37-45.
https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-17445

Čolić N, Čolić R. Dialogic and public space: Participatory approach to urban design. in Arhitektura i urbanizam. 2018;(47):37-45.
doi:10.5937/a-u0-17445 .

Čolić, Nataša, Čolić, Ratka, "Dialogic and public space: Participatory approach to urban design" in Arhitektura i urbanizam, no. 47 (2018):37-45,
https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-17445 . .