TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tošković, Oliver
AU  - Kovač, Vladimir
AU  - Sovilj, Danira
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1202
AB  - The aim of our study was to investigate whether the experience of objects’ implicit features would change if we
observe it as a real 3D object or as a photograph or a drawing. In our experiment 46 participants estimated their
impression of 10 objects shown in four different presentations. As stimuli, we used 3D objects, their virtual
reality models, photographs and drawings from four different viewing directions, created by architecture students.
As a measure of implicit features experience we used 12 bipolar adjectives grouped into four factors
(attractiveness, regularity, arousal, and calmness) and 3 adjectives forming aesthetic experience factor. Results
show significant differences between types of object presentations on four factors of implicit features experience,
but not on the aesthetic experience factor. Real 3D objects were experienced as more attractive and calm, while
VR presentation showed reduced arousal than other presentation types. On regularity VR and real 3D objects
were experienced as same and more regular then drawings and photographs.
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Acta Psychologica
T1  - Lost in projection – Implicit features experience of 3D architectural forms and their projections
VL  - 213
SP  - 103239
DO  - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103239
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Tošković, Oliver and Kovač, Vladimir and Sovilj, Danira",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The aim of our study was to investigate whether the experience of objects’ implicit features would change if we
observe it as a real 3D object or as a photograph or a drawing. In our experiment 46 participants estimated their
impression of 10 objects shown in four different presentations. As stimuli, we used 3D objects, their virtual
reality models, photographs and drawings from four different viewing directions, created by architecture students.
As a measure of implicit features experience we used 12 bipolar adjectives grouped into four factors
(attractiveness, regularity, arousal, and calmness) and 3 adjectives forming aesthetic experience factor. Results
show significant differences between types of object presentations on four factors of implicit features experience,
but not on the aesthetic experience factor. Real 3D objects were experienced as more attractive and calm, while
VR presentation showed reduced arousal than other presentation types. On regularity VR and real 3D objects
were experienced as same and more regular then drawings and photographs.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
title = "Lost in projection – Implicit features experience of 3D architectural forms and their projections",
volume = "213",
pages = "103239",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103239"
}

Tošković, O., Kovač, V.,& Sovilj, D.. (2021). Lost in projection – Implicit features experience of 3D architectural forms and their projections. in Acta Psychologica
Elsevier., 213, 103239.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103239

Tošković O, Kovač V, Sovilj D. Lost in projection – Implicit features experience of 3D architectural forms and their projections. in Acta Psychologica. 2021;213:103239.
doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103239 .

Tošković, Oliver, Kovač, Vladimir, Sovilj, Danira, "Lost in projection – Implicit features experience of 3D architectural forms and their projections" in Acta Psychologica, 213 (2021):103239,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103239 . .