Show simple item record

dc.creatorLukić, Ivana
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T13:31:48Z
dc.date.available2020-12-22T13:31:48Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1450-569X
dc.identifier.issn2217-8066
dc.identifier.urihttps://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1112
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this paper is to establish the connection between gentrification and planning, as a form of state and civil intervention, along with citing instances of local community reactions to negative effects of gentrification. The work examines how these two forms of public intervention, by means of implementing measures/actions, influence positive and negative effects of gentrification and contribute to maintaining balance between them. Furthermore, it explains how they act in service of public interest. The main criterion for the selection of research examples has been the form of intervention implemented (measures/actions, that is, their diversity). Most examples have been drawn from the USA where, on account of its liberal economic system, the power of planning is weaker, negative effects of gentrification are more dominant and gentrification itself is considered a negative phenomenon. The main objective of the analysis is to determine how to minimize the negative effects. A small number of examples presented have been taken from developed European countries, since those states exert stronger influence on planning and the state/community is more responsible for housing problems and existence of different groups of individuals in the community. Those instances illustrate the maximization of positive effects. In addition, some examples have been drawn from transitional, post-socialist Balkan countries where anti-planning attitude is dominant and negative effects of gentrification are more present. Given their effects on gentrification, the most successful measures/actions, applied in the form of public intervention, ordered by category, are as follows: affordable housing, jobs, local regulations, partnership and direct actions.en
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherInstitute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbiasr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceSpatiumsr
dc.subjectGentrificationsr
dc.subjectPositive and negative effects of gentrificationsr
dc.subjectPlanningsr
dc.subjectCivil initiativesr
dc.titleInfluence of planning and civil initiative, as a form of public intervention, on gentrificationen
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-NDsr
dcterms.abstractЛукић, Ивана; Инфлуенце оф планнинг анд цивил инитиативе, ас а форм оф публиц интервентион, он гентрифицатион; Инфлуенце оф планнинг анд цивил инитиативе, ас а форм оф публиц интервентион, он гентрифицатион;
dc.citation.issue25
dc.citation.spage56
dc.citation.epage66
dc.citation.rankM24
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/SPAT1125056L
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84861424747
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/3840/LukicIvanaInfluence.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record