RAF - Repository of the Faculty of Architecture
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RAF
  • Arhitektonski fakultet
  • Publikacije istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   RAF
  • Arhitektonski fakultet
  • Publikacije istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield investment: Is Serbia on the way to integrated land management?

No Thumbnail
Authors
Perić, Ana
Maruna, Marija
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The paper discusses the possibilities and practices of brownfield and greenfield investment within the Serbian urban development framework. First, a broader context of brownfield regeneration and greenfield investment in transition countries is described. After this introduction, the current urban tendencies and conditions of urban transformation in Serbia are shown. The central part of the paper illustrates a comparative analysis of both positive and negative effects of brownfield and greenfield development. The main parameters for the analysis are determined according to the principal aspects of sustainable development - economic, social, and environmental. An example used to explain the benefits of greenfield investment is that of the Ecka industrial site in Zrenjanin, Serbia. The analysis presents a critical evaluation of the current urban tendencies, and aims to estimate the extent of integration between the development processes. The last part of the paper draws out implications ...for similar complex urban issues.

Keywords:
Brownfield redevelopment / Greenfield investment / Post-socialist city / Serbian industrial zones / Sustainable urban development
Source:
Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 2013, 6, 1, 79-90

ISSN: 1752-9638

Scopus: 2-s2.0-84876182222
[ Google Scholar ]
2
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_141
URI
https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/141
Collections
  • Publikacije istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Arhitektonski fakultet
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Perić, Ana
AU  - Maruna, Marija
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/141
AB  - The paper discusses the possibilities and practices of brownfield and greenfield investment within the Serbian urban development framework. First, a broader context of brownfield regeneration and greenfield investment in transition countries is described. After this introduction, the current urban tendencies and conditions of urban transformation in Serbia are shown. The central part of the paper illustrates a comparative analysis of both positive and negative effects of brownfield and greenfield development. The main parameters for the analysis are determined according to the principal aspects of sustainable development - economic, social, and environmental. An example used to explain the benefits of greenfield investment is that of the Ecka industrial site in Zrenjanin, Serbia. The analysis presents a critical evaluation of the current urban tendencies, and aims to estimate the extent of integration between the development processes. The last part of the paper draws out implications for similar complex urban issues.
T2  - Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal
T1  - Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield investment: Is Serbia on the way to integrated land management?
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
SP  - 79
EP  - 90
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_141
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Perić, Ana and Maruna, Marija",
year = "2013",
abstract = "The paper discusses the possibilities and practices of brownfield and greenfield investment within the Serbian urban development framework. First, a broader context of brownfield regeneration and greenfield investment in transition countries is described. After this introduction, the current urban tendencies and conditions of urban transformation in Serbia are shown. The central part of the paper illustrates a comparative analysis of both positive and negative effects of brownfield and greenfield development. The main parameters for the analysis are determined according to the principal aspects of sustainable development - economic, social, and environmental. An example used to explain the benefits of greenfield investment is that of the Ecka industrial site in Zrenjanin, Serbia. The analysis presents a critical evaluation of the current urban tendencies, and aims to estimate the extent of integration between the development processes. The last part of the paper draws out implications for similar complex urban issues.",
journal = "Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal",
title = "Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield investment: Is Serbia on the way to integrated land management?",
volume = "6",
number = "1",
pages = "79-90",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_141"
}
Perić, A.,& Maruna, M.. (2013). Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield investment: Is Serbia on the way to integrated land management?. in Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 6(1), 79-90.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_141
Perić A, Maruna M. Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield investment: Is Serbia on the way to integrated land management?. in Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal. 2013;6(1):79-90.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_141 .
Perić, Ana, Maruna, Marija, "Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield investment: Is Serbia on the way to integrated land management?" in Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 6, no. 1 (2013):79-90,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_141 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB