Приказ основних података о документу

dc.contributorFikfak, Alenka
dc.contributorVaništa Lazarević, Eva
dc.contributorFikfak, Nataša
dc.contributorVukmirović, Milena
dc.contributorGabrijelčič, Peter
dc.creatorPetrović, Filip
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-06T19:51:49Z
dc.date.available2020-05-06T19:51:49Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.isbn978-961-6823-68-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/663
dc.description.abstractPoor health is associated with poorer living circumstances (Ellaway et al., 2012) and there is therefore, a logical expectation that housing improvements and area regeneration in disadvantaged urban areas will improve health and reduce social inequalities in health (Kearns et al., 2009; WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, 2008). Urban regeneration can thus be considered a public health intervention whereby improvements in health and wellbeing are stated as specific aims of regeneration strategies (Beck et al., 2010). Regeneration in most cases includes a range of activities that potentially may improve the interlinked realities of household, dwelling, community and neighbourhood environment in urban areas, thereby impacting on many of the social determinants of health (Dahlgren and Whitehead, 2007). However, to date the evidence that regeneration activities achieve these health benefits is limited or weak and any health effects are small (Jacobs et al., 2010). Evidence for long-term effects and the mechanisms by which different interventions or combinations of interventions might lead to positive health outcomes tend also to be rare (Jacobs et al., 2010). There are also concerns that regeneration activities may have unintended consequences of social disruption and displacement through gentrification (Lindberg et al., 2010). This paper therefore collects information and evidence of urban regeneration projects in a systematic way, both from historic urban regeneration projects and new modern models of regeneration, analysing and evaluating them from population health impact perspective. Paper concludes with recommendations of necessary future aims and methods to implement in urban regeneration projects as to achieve improvements in population health and health equality.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherLjubljana : Faculty of Architecturesr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceKeeping up with technologies to make healthy places : book of conference proceedings / [2nd International Academic Conference] Places and Technologies 2015, Nova Gorica, Sloveniasr
dc.subjectUrban regenerationsr
dc.subjectPopulation healthsr
dc.subjectEffectsr
dc.subjectImprovementsr
dc.subjectGentrificationsr
dc.titleUrban regeneration as a tool for population health improvementen
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dcterms.abstractПетровић, Филип;
dc.citation.spage272
dc.citation.epage280
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/1788/Book_of_Proceedings_PT2015FPetrovic.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_663
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу