Приказ основних података о документу

dc.contributorBisello, Adriano
dc.contributorVettorato, Daniele
dc.contributorLaconte, Pierre
dc.contributorCosta, Simona
dc.creatorPapamichail, Theodora
dc.creatorPerić, Ana
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-19T10:36:52Z
dc.date.available2020-05-19T10:36:52Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-75773-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/732
dc.description.abstractDue to a controversial historical and political background and the prolonged socioeconomic crisis, the culture of collaboration and dialogue is not cultivated at any governance level in Greece. On the contrary, the conventional self-financed real-estate development model is deeply rooted within Greek society—planning regulation supports greenfield development instead of implementing urban renewal or compact-city policies. As a result, Greek cities are affected by sprawl and, often, illegitimate development tendencies. In order to effectively cope with such urban problems, there is an idea of introducing a communicative rationality approach—a tool towards promoting a resilient governance system. However, since collaborative dialogue, networks and trustful relationships among the relevant players build the core of communicative rationality, it is rather challenging to implement an approach in Greece such as a fuzzy-governance context. The paper revolves around two main questions: How can tailor-made initiatives transcend the current sociopolitical obstacles in Greece and contribute to resilient spatial development? How could the country absorb the social, political and intellectual capital in practice that is produced by collaborative initiatives? The central part of the research is the case study presenting the informal planning method (called the Test Planning Process), applied for the first time in the Greek planning context in the city of Patras. Elucidating the role of various actors involved in the process, the paper shows how collaboration in consecutive steps, based on expertise and impartial participation, may reverse irrational decisions, thus promoting the gradual development of an informal approach to spatial planning.en
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherCham: Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Naturesr
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesssr
dc.sourceSmart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions (Results of SSPCR 2017)sr
dc.subjectcommunicative rationalitysr
dc.subjectresilient governancesr
dc.subjectinformal planning proceduressr
dc.subjectGreecesr
dc.titleInformal planning: Towards promoting resilient governance in Greeceen
dc.typebookPartsr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dcterms.abstractПерић, Aна; Папамицхаил, Тхеодора;
dc.rights.holder© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018sr
dc.citation.spage523
dc.citation.epage536
dc.identifier.wos000452448400035
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_35
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85045975835
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу