RAF - Repository of the Faculty of Architecture
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RAF
  • Arhitektonski fakultet
  • Publikacije istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   RAF
  • Arhitektonski fakultet
  • Publikacije istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Expert Advisory Platforms: A Critical Analysis of Collaborative Planning Procedures

Authorized Users Only
2015
Authors
Perić, Ana
Soltaniehha, Mahdokht
Contributors
Scholl, Bernd
Perić, Ana
Dubbeling, Martin
Book part (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
For the first time in the world’s history, the majority of mankind lives in urban areas. Hence, we must be aware of new terms related to human settlements. According to biologists Crutzen and Stoermer (2000), we live in the ‘anthropocene age’. Moreover, some authors agree that today’s man is a sort of ‘homo urbanus’ (Tibaijuka, Maseland & Moor, 2004). A shift in human habitat towards urban living brings great challenges for the sustainable development of cities, as well as for the prosperity of their citizens. In other words, the human race is supposed to cope with complex spatial problems in order to reach sustainability. The critical question that arises here is: How to deal with complexity in a rapidly urbanising world? The possible answer is that we need different ‘lenses’ for looking at spatial problems. Furthermore, we can assume that different ways of thinking demand different ways of planning from what is considered a traditional planning model (Healey in Perić, 2014).... More precisely, over the previous two decades, spatial and urban planning has been based on the principles of communication, collaboration and cooperation among numerous stakeholders.....

Keywords:
Collaborative Planning Paradigm / Planning Practice / Expert collaborative platforms
Source:
Ten Years of UPATs: Reflections and Results, 2015, 21-37
Publisher:
  • Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG, ETH Zürich

ISBN: 978-3-7281-3717-3

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_738
URI
https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/738
Collections
  • Publikacije istraživača / Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Arhitektonski fakultet
TY  - CHAP
AU  - Perić, Ana
AU  - Soltaniehha, Mahdokht
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/738
AB  - For the first time in the world’s history, the majority of mankind lives in urban
areas. Hence, we must be aware of new terms related to human settlements.
According to biologists Crutzen and Stoermer (2000), we live in the ‘anthropocene age’. Moreover, some authors agree that today’s man is a sort of ‘homo
urbanus’ (Tibaijuka, Maseland & Moor, 2004). A shift in human habitat towards
urban living brings great challenges for the sustainable development of cities,
as well as for the prosperity of their citizens. In other words, the human race
is supposed to cope with complex spatial problems in order to reach sustainability. The critical question that arises here is: How to deal with complexity in a
rapidly urbanising world? The possible answer is that we need different ‘lenses’
for looking at spatial problems. Furthermore, we can assume that different
ways of thinking demand different ways of planning from what is considered a
traditional planning model (Healey in Perić, 2014). More precisely, over the previous two decades, spatial and urban planning has been based on the principles
of communication, collaboration and cooperation among numerous stakeholders.....
PB  - Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG, ETH Zürich
T2  - Ten Years of UPATs: Reflections and Results
T1  - Expert Advisory Platforms: A Critical Analysis of Collaborative Planning Procedures
SP  - 21
EP  - 37
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_738
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Perić, Ana and Soltaniehha, Mahdokht",
year = "2015",
abstract = "For the first time in the world’s history, the majority of mankind lives in urban
areas. Hence, we must be aware of new terms related to human settlements.
According to biologists Crutzen and Stoermer (2000), we live in the ‘anthropocene age’. Moreover, some authors agree that today’s man is a sort of ‘homo
urbanus’ (Tibaijuka, Maseland & Moor, 2004). A shift in human habitat towards
urban living brings great challenges for the sustainable development of cities,
as well as for the prosperity of their citizens. In other words, the human race
is supposed to cope with complex spatial problems in order to reach sustainability. The critical question that arises here is: How to deal with complexity in a
rapidly urbanising world? The possible answer is that we need different ‘lenses’
for looking at spatial problems. Furthermore, we can assume that different
ways of thinking demand different ways of planning from what is considered a
traditional planning model (Healey in Perić, 2014). More precisely, over the previous two decades, spatial and urban planning has been based on the principles
of communication, collaboration and cooperation among numerous stakeholders.....",
publisher = "Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG, ETH Zürich",
journal = "Ten Years of UPATs: Reflections and Results",
booktitle = "Expert Advisory Platforms: A Critical Analysis of Collaborative Planning Procedures",
pages = "21-37",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_738"
}
Perić, A.,& Soltaniehha, M.. (2015). Expert Advisory Platforms: A Critical Analysis of Collaborative Planning Procedures. in Ten Years of UPATs: Reflections and Results
Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG, ETH Zürich., 21-37.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_738
Perić A, Soltaniehha M. Expert Advisory Platforms: A Critical Analysis of Collaborative Planning Procedures. in Ten Years of UPATs: Reflections and Results. 2015;:21-37.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_738 .
Perić, Ana, Soltaniehha, Mahdokht, "Expert Advisory Platforms: A Critical Analysis of Collaborative Planning Procedures" in Ten Years of UPATs: Reflections and Results (2015):21-37,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_738 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB