Building Simulations and Modelling: Energy
Аутори
Ignjatović, DušanRajčić, Aleksandar
Stanković, Bojana
Остала ауторства
Konstantinou, ThaliaĆuković Ignjatović, Nataša
Zbašnik Senegačnik, Martina
Поглавље у монографији (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
The quest to achieve high standards in energy efficiency has resulted in the development of complex simulation tools that aim for a precise calculation of energy performance, thus supporting building design as well as the management process.
Common questions regarding the simulation of performance address several issues: during what stage is simulation being conducted (preliminary design, main design, dimensioning of the systems, certification), how complex is the procedure, what resources are needed (data and computational) etc.
In everyday practice we are confronted with a variety of available software options, each of which is advertised as the right choice for building energy performance simulation. With regard to the approach towards modelling, complexity, and simulation processes, we can distinguish several application levels, each having certain advantages and disadvantages. The starting point for an adequate simulation procedure relies on the available legislation and profes...sional standards, calculation procedures, and computational logic. Depending on the desired outcome or goal of the process, an adequate simulation strategy must be applied. A comparison between the two most commonly used pieces of simulation software in Serbia, KnaufTerm2 and Ecotect, has been conducted, illustrating the differences in procedure and the results gained.
Кључне речи:
Energy efficiency / ModdelingИзвор:
Energy resources and building performance, 2018, 129-143Издавач:
- Delft : TU Delft Open
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Erasmus+ project, Creating the Network of Knowledge Labs for Sustainable and Resilient Environments (KLABS)
Институција/група
Arhitektonski fakultetTY - CHAP AU - Ignjatović, Dušan AU - Rajčić, Aleksandar AU - Stanković, Bojana PY - 2018 UR - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/851 AB - The quest to achieve high standards in energy efficiency has resulted in the development of complex simulation tools that aim for a precise calculation of energy performance, thus supporting building design as well as the management process. Common questions regarding the simulation of performance address several issues: during what stage is simulation being conducted (preliminary design, main design, dimensioning of the systems, certification), how complex is the procedure, what resources are needed (data and computational) etc. In everyday practice we are confronted with a variety of available software options, each of which is advertised as the right choice for building energy performance simulation. With regard to the approach towards modelling, complexity, and simulation processes, we can distinguish several application levels, each having certain advantages and disadvantages. The starting point for an adequate simulation procedure relies on the available legislation and professional standards, calculation procedures, and computational logic. Depending on the desired outcome or goal of the process, an adequate simulation strategy must be applied. A comparison between the two most commonly used pieces of simulation software in Serbia, KnaufTerm2 and Ecotect, has been conducted, illustrating the differences in procedure and the results gained. PB - Delft : TU Delft Open T2 - Energy resources and building performance T1 - Building Simulations and Modelling: Energy SP - 129 EP - 143 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_851 ER -
@inbook{ author = "Ignjatović, Dušan and Rajčić, Aleksandar and Stanković, Bojana", year = "2018", abstract = "The quest to achieve high standards in energy efficiency has resulted in the development of complex simulation tools that aim for a precise calculation of energy performance, thus supporting building design as well as the management process. Common questions regarding the simulation of performance address several issues: during what stage is simulation being conducted (preliminary design, main design, dimensioning of the systems, certification), how complex is the procedure, what resources are needed (data and computational) etc. In everyday practice we are confronted with a variety of available software options, each of which is advertised as the right choice for building energy performance simulation. With regard to the approach towards modelling, complexity, and simulation processes, we can distinguish several application levels, each having certain advantages and disadvantages. The starting point for an adequate simulation procedure relies on the available legislation and professional standards, calculation procedures, and computational logic. Depending on the desired outcome or goal of the process, an adequate simulation strategy must be applied. A comparison between the two most commonly used pieces of simulation software in Serbia, KnaufTerm2 and Ecotect, has been conducted, illustrating the differences in procedure and the results gained.", publisher = "Delft : TU Delft Open", journal = "Energy resources and building performance", booktitle = "Building Simulations and Modelling: Energy", pages = "129-143", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_851" }
Ignjatović, D., Rajčić, A.,& Stanković, B.. (2018). Building Simulations and Modelling: Energy. in Energy resources and building performance Delft : TU Delft Open., 129-143. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_851
Ignjatović D, Rajčić A, Stanković B. Building Simulations and Modelling: Energy. in Energy resources and building performance. 2018;:129-143. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_851 .
Ignjatović, Dušan, Rajčić, Aleksandar, Stanković, Bojana, "Building Simulations and Modelling: Energy" in Energy resources and building performance (2018):129-143, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_851 .