Comments on ('Saopštenja') of the new school (of architecture)

Abstract

The comments on 'Saopštenja'(Informer - Notices) of the New school (of architecture) represent the analysis of the publication of a group of bulletins which during the period of 1970/1971 was edited by the Tripartite Committee of the Assembly of the Working Community of the Faculty of Architecture (as abbreviated The Board for the New School), with the intention of presenting to the public the process of tuition reform at the Faculty of Architecture. Being the Dean and the Chairman of the Committee at that time, Prof. Bogdan Bogdanović was the most significant participant in the reform process, and by that fact also the most responsible person for the contents of 'Saopštenja'. Today, these bulletins present the most valuable documents of the reform process of that time which enables one to follow both the implementation procedure and also the scientific and theoretical aspirations within the field of architecture and urbanism which provided the orientation to the reform. Also, these bulletins in a rather interesting way present the beliefs of that time on which manner the tuition within the field of architecture and urbanism should be carried out, particularly in respect to the significant social, political and cultural circumstances of that period. At the same time, this analysis attempts to find out the causes due to which the tuition of the New school of architecture lasted for quite short time.

Komentari uz 'Saopštenja' Nove škole (arhitekture) predstavljaju analizu izdanja grupe biltena koje je u periodu 1970/71. uređivala Tripartritna komisija Zbora radne zajednice Arhitektonskog fakulteta (skraćeno: Odbor za Novu školu), sa namerom da prezentuje javnosti proces reforme nastave na Arhitektonskom fakultetu. Kao tadašnji dekan i predsednik Komisije, prof. Bogdan Bogdanović bio je najznačajniji učesnik u procesu reforme, a samim tim i najodgovorniji za sadržaje 'Saopštenja'. Ovi bilteni danas predstavljaju najdragocenije dokumente tadašnjeg procesa reforme iz kojih se može pratiti kako njegov postupak sprovođenja i metodologija tog procnjsa tako i naučne i teorijske aspiracije u oblasti arhitekture i urbanizma koje su reformu usmeravale. Takođe, ovi bilteni na veoma zanimljiv način predstavljaju ondašnja uverenja o tome na koji način treba sprovoditi nastavu iz oblasti arhitekture i urbanizma, posebno u odnosu na značajne društvene, političke i kulturne okolnosti tog perioda. Ujedno, ova analiza pokušava da otkrije uzroke zbog kojih je nastava Nove škole arhitekture trajala veoma kratko.