The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings?
Apstrakt
Theoretical interpretations and attempts at instrumentalisation
of the ties and exchanges between philosophy and architecture
have mostly been directed at questions of language or the
institutionalisation of the discipline of architecture. In this text,
I suggest a different approach to philosophical engagement
in architecture: a simultaneous use in the methodology of
the architectural project and constitution of a philosophy of
architecture, not only as a question of interdisciplinary exchange,
but as an integral part of comprehensive architectural processes,
with philosophy still maintaining its original authenticity. My
approach is twofold: explain the methodology and delineate
its framework, but also raise the question what is an architect’s
philosophical platform. To that end, I will attempt to elaborate
three models: 1) the first delves partially into the fields of fiction
and illusion, and in it the architect adopts the role (position) of the
philosopher, 2) the s...econd model is the architectural engagement
of philosophical notions, and 3) the third is the use of philosophical
concepts in the creation of architectural ones. Corresponding to
each, I will suggest the activity of “repetition of difference” as a
possibility of creation of the authentic architectural concept.
Ključne reči:
Concept / Architecture / Difference / Philosophy / PlatformIzvor:
SAJ : Serbian architectural journal, 2017, 9, 3, 201-216Izdavač:
- Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Architecture
Institucija/grupa
Arhitektonski fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Vesnić, Snežana PY - 2017 UR - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/431 AB - Theoretical interpretations and attempts at instrumentalisation of the ties and exchanges between philosophy and architecture have mostly been directed at questions of language or the institutionalisation of the discipline of architecture. In this text, I suggest a different approach to philosophical engagement in architecture: a simultaneous use in the methodology of the architectural project and constitution of a philosophy of architecture, not only as a question of interdisciplinary exchange, but as an integral part of comprehensive architectural processes, with philosophy still maintaining its original authenticity. My approach is twofold: explain the methodology and delineate its framework, but also raise the question what is an architect’s philosophical platform. To that end, I will attempt to elaborate three models: 1) the first delves partially into the fields of fiction and illusion, and in it the architect adopts the role (position) of the philosopher, 2) the second model is the architectural engagement of philosophical notions, and 3) the third is the use of philosophical concepts in the creation of architectural ones. Corresponding to each, I will suggest the activity of “repetition of difference” as a possibility of creation of the authentic architectural concept. PB - Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Architecture T2 - SAJ : Serbian architectural journal T1 - The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings? VL - 9 IS - 3 SP - 201 EP - 216 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_431 ER -
@article{ author = "Vesnić, Snežana", year = "2017", abstract = "Theoretical interpretations and attempts at instrumentalisation of the ties and exchanges between philosophy and architecture have mostly been directed at questions of language or the institutionalisation of the discipline of architecture. In this text, I suggest a different approach to philosophical engagement in architecture: a simultaneous use in the methodology of the architectural project and constitution of a philosophy of architecture, not only as a question of interdisciplinary exchange, but as an integral part of comprehensive architectural processes, with philosophy still maintaining its original authenticity. My approach is twofold: explain the methodology and delineate its framework, but also raise the question what is an architect’s philosophical platform. To that end, I will attempt to elaborate three models: 1) the first delves partially into the fields of fiction and illusion, and in it the architect adopts the role (position) of the philosopher, 2) the second model is the architectural engagement of philosophical notions, and 3) the third is the use of philosophical concepts in the creation of architectural ones. Corresponding to each, I will suggest the activity of “repetition of difference” as a possibility of creation of the authentic architectural concept.", publisher = "Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Architecture", journal = "SAJ : Serbian architectural journal", title = "The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings?", volume = "9", number = "3", pages = "201-216", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_431" }
Vesnić, S.. (2017). The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings?. in SAJ : Serbian architectural journal Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Architecture., 9(3), 201-216. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_431
Vesnić S. The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings?. in SAJ : Serbian architectural journal. 2017;9(3):201-216. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_431 .
Vesnić, Snežana, "The Philosophical Platform of the Architect. Why Philosophers Make Such Good Drawings?" in SAJ : Serbian architectural journal, 9, no. 3 (2017):201-216, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raf_431 .