TY  - JOUR
AU  - Маруна, Марија
AU  - Теофиловић, Весна
AU  - Миловановић Родић, Данијела
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1934
AB  - Рад је посвећен истраживању трансформације
институционалне структуре урбанистичког планирања у
периоду постсоцијалистичке транзиције у Србији. Циљ је
омогућавање увида у путању модификације урбанистичког
планирања услед структурних промена друштвено-
економског и политичког система у временском обухвату
од 2000. године до данас. У фокусу истраживања су
анализа промена улоге и позиције институција у процесима
одлучивања о урбаном развоју, и посебно механизми који
се у тим процесима користе. Кроз хронолошки преглед
урбанистичких планова изабраних новобеоградских
блокова на Савском кеју посматра се неколико аспеката
процеса планирања: (а) промене у планираним наменама
површина, (б) промене у учешћу институција у процесу
планирања и (ц) промене у коришћеним механизмима
у процесу планирања. Резултати истраживања показују
да је током две деценије постсоцијалистичке транзиције
урбанистичко планирање трансформисано у правцу: (а)
кључног инструмента за редистрибуцију просторних
ресурса у корист интереса приватног капитала, (б)
централизације одлучивања − у вертикалном смислу кроз
проширени утицај виших нивоа власти, а у хоризонталном
смислу концентрацијом моћи у оквиру групе доносилаца
одлука на градском нивоу и (ц) разраде механизама
доношења одлука на самом крају процеса планирања и
унутар уског круга институција градске власти, употребом
института амандмана.
AB  - The article researches the transformation of the urban
planning institutional structure in the period of the postsocialist
transition in Serbia. The goal is to provide an insight
into the path of how urban planning has been modified due to
structural changes in the socio-economic and political system
in the period from 2000 to the present day. The focus of the
research is the change in the role and position of institutions
in decision-making processes on urban development, and
especially the instruments used in those processes. Through a
chronological review of the urban plans of New Belgrade blocks
on the Sava Quay, several aspects of the planning process are
observed: (a) changes in the planned uses of areas, (b) changes
in the participation of institutions in the planning process and
(c) changes in the instruments used in the planning process.
The results of the research show that during the two decades of
the post-socialist transition, urban planning was transformed
in the direction of: (a) becoming a key instrument for the
redistribution of spatial resources in favor of the interests of
private capital; (b) the centralization of decision-making -
vertically through the expanded influence of higher levels of
government, and horizontally by the concentration of power
within the group of decision-makers at the city level; and (c)
the elaboration of decision-making mechanisms at the very
end of the planning process and within a narrow circle of city
government institutions, using the institute of amendments.
PB  - Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије
T2  - Архитектура и урбанизам
T1  - Трансформација институционалне структуре урбанистичког планирања у постсоцијалистичкој транзицији: пример Савског кеја на Новом Београду
T1  - Transformation of the urban planning institutional structure in post-socialist transition: the example of the Sava waterfront in Belgrade
SP  - 5
EP  - 16
DO  - 10.5937/a-u0-45379
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Маруна, Марија and Теофиловић, Весна and Миловановић Родић, Данијела",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Рад је посвећен истраживању трансформације
институционалне структуре урбанистичког планирања у
периоду постсоцијалистичке транзиције у Србији. Циљ је
омогућавање увида у путању модификације урбанистичког
планирања услед структурних промена друштвено-
економског и политичког система у временском обухвату
од 2000. године до данас. У фокусу истраживања су
анализа промена улоге и позиције институција у процесима
одлучивања о урбаном развоју, и посебно механизми који
се у тим процесима користе. Кроз хронолошки преглед
урбанистичких планова изабраних новобеоградских
блокова на Савском кеју посматра се неколико аспеката
процеса планирања: (а) промене у планираним наменама
површина, (б) промене у учешћу институција у процесу
планирања и (ц) промене у коришћеним механизмима
у процесу планирања. Резултати истраживања показују
да је током две деценије постсоцијалистичке транзиције
урбанистичко планирање трансформисано у правцу: (а)
кључног инструмента за редистрибуцију просторних
ресурса у корист интереса приватног капитала, (б)
централизације одлучивања − у вертикалном смислу кроз
проширени утицај виших нивоа власти, а у хоризонталном
смислу концентрацијом моћи у оквиру групе доносилаца
одлука на градском нивоу и (ц) разраде механизама
доношења одлука на самом крају процеса планирања и
унутар уског круга институција градске власти, употребом
института амандмана., The article researches the transformation of the urban
planning institutional structure in the period of the postsocialist
transition in Serbia. The goal is to provide an insight
into the path of how urban planning has been modified due to
structural changes in the socio-economic and political system
in the period from 2000 to the present day. The focus of the
research is the change in the role and position of institutions
in decision-making processes on urban development, and
especially the instruments used in those processes. Through a
chronological review of the urban plans of New Belgrade blocks
on the Sava Quay, several aspects of the planning process are
observed: (a) changes in the planned uses of areas, (b) changes
in the participation of institutions in the planning process and
(c) changes in the instruments used in the planning process.
The results of the research show that during the two decades of
the post-socialist transition, urban planning was transformed
in the direction of: (a) becoming a key instrument for the
redistribution of spatial resources in favor of the interests of
private capital; (b) the centralization of decision-making -
vertically through the expanded influence of higher levels of
government, and horizontally by the concentration of power
within the group of decision-makers at the city level; and (c)
the elaboration of decision-making mechanisms at the very
end of the planning process and within a narrow circle of city
government institutions, using the institute of amendments.",
publisher = "Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије",
journal = "Архитектура и урбанизам",
title = "Трансформација институционалне структуре урбанистичког планирања у постсоцијалистичкој транзицији: пример Савског кеја на Новом Београду, Transformation of the urban planning institutional structure in post-socialist transition: the example of the Sava waterfront in Belgrade",
pages = "5-16",
doi = "10.5937/a-u0-45379"
}

Маруна, М., Теофиловић, В.,& Миловановић Родић, Д.. (2023). Трансформација институционалне структуре урбанистичког планирања у постсоцијалистичкој транзицији: пример Савског кеја на Новом Београду. in Архитектура и урбанизам
Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије., 5-16.
https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-45379

Маруна М, Теофиловић В, Миловановић Родић Д. Трансформација институционалне структуре урбанистичког планирања у постсоцијалистичкој транзицији: пример Савског кеја на Новом Београду. in Архитектура и урбанизам. 2023;:5-16.
doi:10.5937/a-u0-45379 .

Маруна, Марија, Теофиловић, Весна, Миловановић Родић, Данијела, "Трансформација институционалне структуре урбанистичког планирања у постсоцијалистичкој транзицији: пример Савског кеја на Новом Београду" in Архитектура и урбанизам (2023):5-16,
https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-45379 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kočović De Santo, Milica
AU  - Milovanović Rodić, Danijela
AU  - Babović, Dunja
AU  - Kuzma, Inga
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://raf.arh.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1635
AB  - Background: The background of this research encompasses contemporary cultural policy issues and theirfactors of influence, with a special focus on cultural participation processes. The sphere of culture provides thefundamental base for reading  and  changing  the  paradigmatic  paths through the contents and acts of formal and  informal  stakeholders.  Culture  is  deeply  interlinked  with  other  departments  of  the  entire  economy  by connections with feedback loops. The impacts of culture on the socio-economic and natural environment, as the  "fourth  pillar"  of  sustainable  development,  are  recognized on  the  international  level  by  theory,  expert groups, and practice.  Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to bring about a deeper understanding of participatory processes and their importance for strategic priority areas of cultural policy development.  Study design/methodology/approach:  Our  study  design  included  institutional  analysis,  starting  from  the regulatory  framework  that  reflects  cultural  policy  and  its  strategic  goals,  by  involving  previous  relevanttheoretical  research  including  the  ICET  model.  Another  objective  of  the  paper  is  to  answer  a  range  ofquestions. What are participation processes' main characteristics and challenges in culture and cultural policydevelopment?  Is  there  a  relationship  between  these  challenges? How  to  achieve  desirable  cultural  and institutional integrative transformations in order to accomplish the strategic priority areas of cultural policy? Webring the conclusions based on theoretic and empirical overview of new empirical research findings based on the survey conducted in 2022 for the need of EPICA research project.1Findings/conclusions: The  findings  of  this  research  lead  us  to  recognition,  conceptualization  and understanding of the existing participatory processes in culture, towards inspiring the future modelling of more integrative strategic and systemic solutions to reflect desirable and harmonized development.  Limitations/future research: The limitations of research reflect future endeavour to contribute to reforming the  field  of  culture  (by  formal  and  informal  means)  through  more  robust  horizontal  integration  with  otherdepartments,  to  achieve  sustainable  and  coherent  effects  through  linking  strategies,  new  forms  ofparticipation, decentralization, arm's length principle, and degrowth policy.
PB  - University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Economics in Subotica
T2  - Strategic Management
T1  - Empowering strategic priority areas of cultural policy: empirical findings on cultural participation processes in Serbia
VL  - 28
IS  - 2
SP  - 45
EP  - 63
DO  - 10.5937/StraMan2200030K
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kočović De Santo, Milica and Milovanović Rodić, Danijela and Babović, Dunja and Kuzma, Inga",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Background: The background of this research encompasses contemporary cultural policy issues and theirfactors of influence, with a special focus on cultural participation processes. The sphere of culture provides thefundamental base for reading  and  changing  the  paradigmatic  paths through the contents and acts of formal and  informal  stakeholders.  Culture  is  deeply  interlinked  with  other  departments  of  the  entire  economy  by connections with feedback loops. The impacts of culture on the socio-economic and natural environment, as the  "fourth  pillar"  of  sustainable  development,  are  recognized on  the  international  level  by  theory,  expert groups, and practice.  Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to bring about a deeper understanding of participatory processes and their importance for strategic priority areas of cultural policy development.  Study design/methodology/approach:  Our  study  design  included  institutional  analysis,  starting  from  the regulatory  framework  that  reflects  cultural  policy  and  its  strategic  goals,  by  involving  previous  relevanttheoretical  research  including  the  ICET  model.  Another  objective  of  the  paper  is  to  answer  a  range  ofquestions. What are participation processes' main characteristics and challenges in culture and cultural policydevelopment?  Is  there  a  relationship  between  these  challenges? How  to  achieve  desirable  cultural  and institutional integrative transformations in order to accomplish the strategic priority areas of cultural policy? Webring the conclusions based on theoretic and empirical overview of new empirical research findings based on the survey conducted in 2022 for the need of EPICA research project.1Findings/conclusions: The  findings  of  this  research  lead  us  to  recognition,  conceptualization  and understanding of the existing participatory processes in culture, towards inspiring the future modelling of more integrative strategic and systemic solutions to reflect desirable and harmonized development.  Limitations/future research: The limitations of research reflect future endeavour to contribute to reforming the  field  of  culture  (by  formal  and  informal  means)  through  more  robust  horizontal  integration  with  otherdepartments,  to  achieve  sustainable  and  coherent  effects  through  linking  strategies,  new  forms  ofparticipation, decentralization, arm's length principle, and degrowth policy.",
publisher = "University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Economics in Subotica",
journal = "Strategic Management",
title = "Empowering strategic priority areas of cultural policy: empirical findings on cultural participation processes in Serbia",
volume = "28",
number = "2",
pages = "45-63",
doi = "10.5937/StraMan2200030K"
}

Kočović De Santo, M., Milovanović Rodić, D., Babović, D.,& Kuzma, I.. (2023). Empowering strategic priority areas of cultural policy: empirical findings on cultural participation processes in Serbia. in Strategic Management
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Economics in Subotica., 28(2), 45-63.
https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMan2200030K

Kočović De Santo M, Milovanović Rodić D, Babović D, Kuzma I. Empowering strategic priority areas of cultural policy: empirical findings on cultural participation processes in Serbia. in Strategic Management. 2023;28(2):45-63.
doi:10.5937/StraMan2200030K .

Kočović De Santo, Milica, Milovanović Rodić, Danijela, Babović, Dunja, Kuzma, Inga, "Empowering strategic priority areas of cultural policy: empirical findings on cultural participation processes in Serbia" in Strategic Management, 28, no. 2 (2023):45-63,
https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMan2200030K . .